MHB Solve the following equations for a

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmae
  • Start date Start date
lmae
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

Need some help on the following equations. I have never been great with maths, algebra especially, and am struggling to understand.Solve the following equation for a:
Q1: 15/a=-10

Q2: Solve for a in the equation: a+5/4+a-6/3=1/6

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi lmae and welcome to MHB! :D

Q1:

15/a = -10

Multiply through by a:

15 = -10a

Rearrange and simplify:

a = -15/10 = -3/2

Make sense?

Q2: Solve for a in the equation: (a + 5)/4 + (a - 6)/3 = 1/6

Multiply through by the least common multiple of 4 and 3, which is 12:

3(a + 5) + 4(a - 6) = 2

O.k? Can you continue?
 
Hi,

Thanks very much for the help. The first now makes total sense to me and was able to complete a whole bunch correctly, so a big thanks!

The second one I am still struggling with. Is that the final answer there? Or should I be doing more working out to get to another answer?
 
3(a + 5) + 4(a - 6) = 2

Distribute:

3 * a + 3 * 5 + 4 * a - 4 * 6 = 2

3a + 15 + 4a - 24 = 2

Combine like terms:

3a + 4a + 15 - 24 = 2

7a - 9 = 2

7a = 2 + 9

7a = 11

a = 11/7
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
939
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top