Solve V_0 & I_0 in Circuit w/ Nodal Analysis

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 14K views
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using nodal analysis, find [itex]v_0[/itex] and [itex]I_0[/itex] in the circuit below.

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/7325/chapter3problem301dy.jpg

Homework Equations



KVL, KCL, V = i R, Super-node

The Attempt at a Solution



So I added 3 current variables, 3 node markers ([itex]V_1\,-\,V_3[/itex]), a super node, a ground node, and marked a KVL loop.

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/6940/chapter3problem30part26cn.jpg

[tex]V_0\,=\,V_3[/tex] <----- Right?

Now I express the currents:

[tex]I_0\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{40\Omega}[/tex]

[tex]I_1\,=\,\frac{100\,-\,V_1}{10\Omega}[/tex]

[tex]I_2\,=\,\frac{4\,V_0\,-\,V_1}{20\Omega}[/tex]

[tex]I_3\,=\,\frac{V_0}{80\Omega}[/tex]

KCL at [itex]V_1[/itex]:

[tex]I_0\,=\,I_1\,+\,I_2[/tex]

[tex]\left(\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{40}\right)\,=\,\left(\frac{100\,-\,V_1}{10}\right)\,+\,\left(\frac{4\,V_3\,-\,V_2}{20}\right)[/tex]

[tex]7\,V_1\,-\,V_2\,-\,8\,V_3\,=\,400[/tex]KCL at super-node:

[tex]I_0\,+\,2\,I_0\,=\,I_3[/tex]

[tex]3\,\left(\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{40}\right)\,-\,\left(\frac{V_0}{80}\right)\,=\,0[/tex]

[tex]6\,V_1\,-\,6\,V_2\,-\,V_3\,=\,0[/tex]KVL inside super-node:

[tex]V_3\,-\,V_2\,=\,120[/tex]Now I put those 3 equations into a matrix and rref to get [itex]V_1\,-\,V_3[/itex].

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0&-1&1&120\\7&-1&-8&400\\6&-6&-1&0\end{array}\right]\,\,\longrightarrow\,\,\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&0&0&-1688\\0&1&0& -1464\\0&0&1&-1344\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]V_3\,=\,V_0\,=\,-1344\,V[/tex]

But -1344 Volts seems too high (or low) doesn't it? Should I have also expressed the currents that I did not mark at the short wires between ground and [itex]V_1[/itex] and [itex]V_3[/itex]? Maybe I should use KVL 1 loop instead of the super-node KVL expression?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
your diagram as it stand contains two wires that short out V1 and V3 making them trivial with respect to ground chosen..should they not be there?
 
Last edited:
Nope, they are there.
 
in that case your (effective) diagram changes dramatically, i m not even sure whether it is consistent?...anyway, if it is consistent: your circuit theory then tells you: I3=0, V_0=0, I2=0, V1=V3=0 so can join them up and form a loop containing the 120V source and 40 ohm resistor..and I_0=3A

it is actually ok i think... consistency wise speaking
 
Last edited:
So how would I go about getting a system of equations for [itex]V_1[/itex] thorugh [itex]V_3[/itex]?
 
you want to find V_0 and I_0, why worry about v1, v2 and v3? they are introduced for node voltage analysis purposes only... but if you really want a "system" of equations: you have
V1=0, V3=0, V2 = -120

all w.r.t. the ground chosen
 
OIC, [itex]V_1[/itex] and [itex]V_3[/itex] are 0 becasue they are both connected to ground through the wires you were asking about.

So for [itex]I_0[/itex] we have

[tex]I_0\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{40\Omega}\,=\,\frac{(0)\,-\,(-120\,V)}{40\Omega}\,=\,3\,A[/tex]

Right?
 
yes. NB: but for this question, introducing V1-V3 are not necessary, just observe that those wires short out several components leading to a simpler circuit and solve by inspection or doing a simple KVL loop (in this case).
 
So, to get [itex]V_0[/itex], I do a KVL loop around the [itex]80\Omega[/itex] and [itex]40\Omega[/itex] and the 120 V source?

[tex]V_0\,+\,40\,I_0\,-\,120\,V\,=\,0\,\,\longrightarrow\,\,V_0\,=\,120\,-\,40(3)\,=\,0\,V[/tex]

So [itex]V_0[/itex] is really zero?
 
by the way, I got V0=0 by inspection. but what you have done is also correct. i guess showing that the circuit is consistent after all