MHB Solve Word Problem w/ Matrices: Chapter I

  • Thread starter Thread starter megacat8921
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a word problem involving the mixing of two solutions using matrices. The problem requires finding the amounts of a 60% solution and a 20% solution needed to create 100 liters of a 50% solution. Two equations are established: one for the total volume of the mixture (x + y = 100) and another for the active ingredient (0.6x + 0.2y = 50), which is simplified to 3x + y = 250 for easier matrix representation. The matrix equation is set up as [1 1; 3 1][x; y] = [100; 250]. The simplification of coefficients to integers by multiplying by 5 is noted as a helpful step in the solution process.
megacat8921
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a word problem that I am struggling with. I have been using matrices in this chapter, but I don't understand how it applies or where to start in order to solve this equation. Here is the word problem:

One hundred liters of a 50% solution is obtained by mixing a 60% solution with a 20% solution. How many liters of each solution must be used to obtain the desired mixture?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let $x$ represent the amount (in liters) of the 60% solution needed, and $y$ be the number of liters of the 20% solution required. Since the final desired outcome is 100 liters of solution, we know:

$$x+y=100$$

We also know that we will need in the final solution 50L of the active ingredient, $0.6x$ coming from the 60% solution and $0.2y$ coming from the 20% solution, then we also have:

$$0.6x+0.2y=50$$

or:

$$3x+y=250$$

So, we can set up our matrix equation as follows:

$$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 & 1 \\ 3 & 1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}x \\ y \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c}100 \\ 250 \end{array}\right]$$

Can you proceed?
 
I can proceed. But I don't understand how .6x and .2y became 3 and 1.

MarkFL said:
I would let $x$ represent the amount (in liters) of the 60% solution needed, and $y$ be the number of liters of the 20% solution required. Since the final desired outcome is 100 liters of solution, we know:

$$x+y=100$$

We also know that we will need in the final solution 50L of the active ingredient, $0.6x$ coming from the 60% solution and $0.2y$ coming from the 20% solution, then we also have:

$$0.6x+0.2y=50$$

or:

$$3x+y=250$$

So, we can set up our matrix equation as follows:

$$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 & 1 \\ 3 & 1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}x \\ y \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c}100 \\ 250 \end{array}\right]$$

Can you proceed?
 
megacat8921 said:
I can proceed. But I don't understand how .6x and .2y became 3 and 1.

I multiplied the equation by 5 so that all coefficients are integers. :D
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top