Solving (-1)vcos θ Identity Problem - Hi Friends!

  • Thread starter Thread starter nesta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
AI Thread Summary
The identity cos(vπ − θ) simplifies to (-1)^v cos θ, where v is an integer. The discussion highlights that sin(nπ) is always zero, allowing for its omission in the equation. By evaluating specific integer values of v, a clear pattern emerges: for even v, the cosine term is positive, and for odd v, it is negative. This confirms that the identity holds true across all integer values of v. Understanding this pattern clarifies the original confusion regarding the identity.
nesta
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,

I am not able to understand how the below shown identity becomes (-1) power v cosθ.

cos(vπ − θ ) = cos vπ cos θ + sin vπ sin θ = (−1)power v cos θ


==> (-1)vcos θ

Please help me understand this basic problem.

Thanks,
Nesta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must mean v is an integer. So v=...-2,-1,0,1,2... Start working out sin(1*pi), sin(2*pi), sin(3*pi) ... and cos(1*pi), cos(2*pi), cos(3*pi) ... Do you see a pattern?
 
Dick said:
You must mean v is an integer. So v=...-2,-1,0,1,2... Start working out sin(1*pi), sin(2*pi), sin(3*pi) ... and cos(1*pi), cos(2*pi), cos(3*pi) ... Do you see a pattern?
Thank you very much, I understand now.

cos vπ cos θ + sin vπ sin θ

Since sin n*pi is always zero, we can omit this.

when,
v=0 : cos(0π)cosθ + sin0 = cosθ
v=1 : cos(1π)cosθ + 0 = -1 cosθ
v=2 : cos(2π)cosθ + 0 = 1 cosθ
v=3 : cos(3π)cosθ + 0 = -1 cosθ

so in general we can write it as (-1)to power v cos θ

Thank you very much.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top