Solving 2-Unknown Algebra Problems: A Challenge!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Warwick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Challenge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving algebra problems with two unknowns, particularly in the context of physics applications. A user seeks challenging algebra problems to enhance their skills, specifically mentioning difficulties with equations involving multiple variables. It is noted that to solve for multiple unknowns, more equations are required, as illustrated by the example of needing to express one variable in terms of another. The conversation also touches on the relevance of systems of linear equations and matrices for solving such problems. Ultimately, the focus remains on improving algebra proficiency to tackle complex physics problems effectively.
Warwick
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Well, my physics teacher loves to make his problems hard, so he makes the physics portion of the problem med difficulty but he makes it so you have to solve with more than 1 unknown present. With big problems on forces I get lost in the algebra so.. I'm trying to improve my algebra skills. If anyone could give a couple algebra problems with 2 unknowns and solve for both, I would be grateful. Give me some nasty ones :)

I was making one up my self and couldn't figure it out.
8=2(2^2)
8=x(k^2)
I tired solving that but I couldn't get the answer,

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have more than 1 unknown, you need more than 1 equation, unless you want one unknown in terms of the others.

8 = xk^2 => k = (8/x)^1/2

It is impossible to get k (or x) with such little info.
 
http://www.ping.be/~ping1339/index.html#Main-Purpose-=-MATH-

Just look at systems of linear equations and look also under matrices and determinants...

regards
marlon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm, yes I remember doing these(not how, heh), never understood the use of them then. So this will work when I have 3 sum of the forces equations in physics when there is more than one unknown?

Can you show me how you would go about solving this one?

u=.065,m=2.5,a=0.12,g=9.8

Tcos20-ukn-mgsin25=ma
n-mgcos25+Tsin20=0

Well this one has only 1 unknown but can you use that matrice technique on it?
 
not necessary, you only need the first equation.

ukn = -ma -mdsin25 + Tcos20

that's all

regards
marlon
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top