1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Solving 2nd ODE for RLC circuit

  1. Mar 31, 2013 #1
    This is really more of a mathematical question than physics.

    Given a RLC circuit, I will arrive at the following DE:


    How do I solve for [itex]Q(t)[/itex]??
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 1, 2013 #2
    A good way is the Laplace transform. Given our equation [itex]\ddot{q}(t) + \frac{R}{L}\dot{q}(t) + \frac{1}{LC}q(t) = \frac{\epsilon}{L}[/itex], we can take the Laplace transform of the equation (denoted by [itex]\ell[/itex]):

    [itex]\ell \{ \ddot{q}(t) \} + \frac{R}{L} \ell \{ \dot{q}(t) \} + \frac{1}{LC} \ell \{ q(t) \} = \ell \{ \frac{\epsilon}{L} \}[/itex]

    [itex][ s^2 Q(s) - sq(0) - \dot{q}(0) ] + \frac{R}{L} [ sQ(s) - q(0) ]+ \frac{1}{LC} Q(s) = \frac{\epsilon}{Ls}[/itex]

    [itex][LCs^2 + RCs+ 1] Q(s) = \frac{C\epsilon}{s} + [LCs + RC]q(0) + LC\dot{q}(0)[/itex]

    [itex]Q(s) = \frac{C\epsilon}{s[LCs^2 + RCs+ 1]} + \frac{[LCs + RC]q(0) + LC\dot{q}(0)}{[LCs^2 + RCs+ 1]}[/itex]

    This is as far as I wanted to go without numbers :smile: If I had numbers, I would substitute them at this point and put things in terms of simpler Laplace transforms so I can do inverse Laplace transforms on each part. You can a table of selected ones here:

Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook