Solving 4-Vectors and Wave Amplitudes in Different Frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the vector K = (v/c, 1/λ, 0, 0) is a 4-vector by applying Lorentz transformations. The amplitude of a wave in frame S, represented as A = cos[2π(vt - x/λ)], is also analyzed to show its form in frame S' as cos[2π(v't' - x'/λ')]. The key conclusion is that K transforms correctly under Lorentz transformations, confirming its status as a 4-vector, and the transformation of wave amplitudes is consistent across different frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-vectors in the context of special relativity
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of wave mechanics and amplitude representation
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformation equations in detail
  • Learn about the properties of 4-vectors in special relativity
  • Explore wave transformations between different inertial frames
  • Investigate the implications of 4-vectors in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying special relativity, wave mechanics, and anyone involved in theoretical physics or engineering applications related to relativistic effects.

captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am aving a bit of trouble understanding how to show something is a 4 vector. For example K = (v/c, 1/lamdba, 0, 0 ) Show it is a 4-vector. I am not quite sure how to start this.
Similarly I have the amplitude of a wave in frame S described as A=cos[2PI(vt-x/lambda)] and need to show that the amplitude of te wave in S' can be written as cos[2PI(v't'-x'/lambda')


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to do the first part

My attempt at the second part
vt-x/lambda
= vct/c - x/lambda
=v/c(gamma(ct'+beta x')) -1/lambda *gamma(x'+beta ct')
=ct' gamma(v/c-beta/lambda)-x'gamma (1/lambda-beta v/c)
using a similar question in my notes but I don't think this is right and I don't know how it helps?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think we do this question by showing that K transforms by a Lorentz transformation (since the definition of a 4 vector is a 4 component vector that transforms under Lorentz transformations).

When you do this, you'll see K'=(v'/c, 1/lambda',0,0), once you substitute in what you got for v' and 1/lambda' in the previous part. You got the same values for these as I did, by the way so I think they are correct. I'm pretty sure this is all you have to do to show it transforms by LT. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K