Solving 6/(2[1+2]), 3(3)=1 Confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter leapoldstotch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the mathematical expression 6/2(1+2) and the ambiguity in its evaluation. The consensus is that the correct answer is 9, but there is debate about the interpretation of the order of operations. Some argue that the expression can be evaluated as 6/(2[1+2])=1 or 3(3)=1, leading to confusion. The main point of contention is whether one should prioritize evaluating the parenthesis before performing division from left to right. While some calculators yield 1 for the expression, participants seek authoritative sources that clarify the need to evaluate expressions affecting parentheses first. The conversation highlights the ongoing confusion surrounding order of operations in mathematics.
leapoldstotch
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Of course the answer is 9. But my question is, some sources say this is written ambiguously.
as in, 6/(2[1+2])=1
or 3(3)=1
Why do some people say one needs to evaluate what is effecting the parenthesis before dividing from left to right? I don't see anything in order of operations that would assume the first option. But when you type 6/2(1+2) into some calculators, it gives you 1. Can anybody find a source that says one needs to evaluate what is effecting the parenthesis before dividing from left to right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This has been covered over and over and over. This is not physics. Reported.
 
Every day we learn new things. Sometimes it's just a small fact or realization. No matter how trivial or random, let's start recording our daily lessons. Please start off with "Today I learned". Keep commentary to a minimum and just LIKE posts. I'll start! Today I learned that you clean up a white hat by spraying some cleaner with bleach on it (rinse before putting it back on your head!)
Back
Top