Solving a Laplace Transform Problem: Where Am I Going Wrong?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a Laplace Transform problem involving a second-order differential equation with specific initial conditions. Participants are examining the steps taken in the solution process, identifying potential errors, and discussing the application of the convolution theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster presents their approach to solving the differential equation using Laplace Transforms and expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their solution.
  • One participant suggests that the inverse Laplace Transform of a term was incorrectly calculated, noting a missing factor of 1/2 in the expression.
  • Another participant points out that a coefficient in the expression should be corrected from 8 to 332/25 and emphasizes that the convolution should involve trigonometric functions rather than exponentials.
  • A mathematical rule regarding the inverse Laplace Transform is introduced, which may provide additional insight into the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the original solution, as multiple corrections and suggestions are proposed, indicating ongoing disagreement about the proper approach and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the application of the convolution theorem and the accuracy of the coefficients in the Laplace Transform expressions. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the mathematical steps involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals studying differential equations, specifically those interested in Laplace Transforms and their applications in solving initial value problems.

metdave
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm out of college and am brushing up on Laplace Transforms. I have a problem I've solved, but I believe the solution I got is wrong and can't find my error.

The problem is 2x''-x'=t*sin(t) x(0)=5,x'(0)=3

My solution...

Take the Laplace Transform

2(s^2x-5s-3)-(sx-5)=2s/(s^2+1)^2

Rearranging, I get
x(2s^2-s)-10s-1=2s/(s^2+1)^2

Solve for x
x=(10s+1)/(2s^2-s)+2/((2s-1)(s^2+1)^2

Then, doing a PFD on the first term, I get -1/s+8/(2s-1)

Doing an inverse Laplace Transform, I get x(t)=-1+8e^(t/2)+Integral((sin(y)-ycos(y)(e^(1/2)((t-y))dy,0,y)

I used the convolution theorem on the second term on the RHS. That doesn't look right because the initial conditions aren't satisfied. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get inverse laplace of 1/(2s-1) I would rewrite as (1/2)/(s-1/2) which becomes (1/2)e^(1/2t). It appears you did not include the 1/2 factor for two of you terms.
 
Two things jump out
1)in 8/(2s-1) the 8 should be 332/25
2)The convolution should involve trigonometric functions not exponents
This rule is also useful here
$$\mathcal{L}^{-1} \{ \mathrm{F}(s) \} = t \, \mathcal{L}^{-1} \left\{ \int_s^\infty \! \mathrm{F}(u) \, \mathrm{d}u \right\}$$
 
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K