Solving a Limit to Determine the Convergence of a Series

BraedenP
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am asked to determine whether a series converges, and if so, to provide its sum.

The problem is:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-3)^{n-1}4^{-n}

Homework Equations



- I know that if the limit of the sequence as n->inf is finite, then the series converges at that limit.

- I also know that the sum of the given series is equal to said limit (if it exists).

The Attempt at a Solution



1. I rewrote the series as a limit and turned it into a fraction: \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(-3)^{n-1}}{4^n}

2. Then as n\rightarrow\infty the denominator approaches infinity, and the numerator begins to oscillate (for even n values, it's a large positive number, and for odd n values it's a large negative number).

3. Thus, I concluded that the limit does not exist, and thus the series does not converge.

However, this limit actually evaluates to 0, meaning that the series converges and sums up to 0. How is this? I'm quite confused...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BraedenP said:

Homework Statement



I am asked to determine whether a series converges, and if so, to provide its sum.

The problem is:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-3)^{n-1}4^{-n}

Homework Equations



- I know that if the limit of the sequence as n->inf is finite, then the series converges at that limit.

- I also know that the sum of the given series is equal to said limit (if it exists).

The Attempt at a Solution



1. I rewrote the series as a limit and turned it into a fraction: \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(-3)^{n-1}}{4^n}

2. Then as n\rightarrow\infty the denominator approaches infinity, and the numerator begins to oscillate (for even n values, it's a large positive number, and for odd n values it's a large negative number).

3. Thus, I concluded that the limit does not exist, and thus the series does not converge.

However, this limit actually evaluates to 0, meaning that the series converges and sums up to 0. How is this? I'm quite confused...

Pull a factor of 1/4 out to get the exponents aligned, so that what you're summing is \left(\frac{-3}{4}\right)^{n-1}
 
Oh, okay. That makes sense. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
BraedenP said:
Okay.. That makes sense, but in this case the limit evaluates to infinity, doesn't it? It should evaluate to 0.
\displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{-3}{4}\right)^{n-1}=0

This is necessary for the series (the sum) to converge, but it's not enough to guarantee it.

That will take a bit more work.

As a start, write out the first several terms ot the series, then look at the sum of any two consecutive terms of the series.
 
Alternatively, this is a geometric series, which is probably one of the first series presented when you started learning about series.
 
Yeah, thanks guys. I was reading that all wrong. Makes perfect sense now :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top