Solving a Line Integral Using Green's Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a line integral using Green's Theorem for the vector field F = (x^2 + y^2)i + 3xy^2j over the circle defined by x^2 + y^2 = 9. The initial calculations led to an incorrect result, with the user expressing confusion over the discrepancy between their answer and the book's solution. Key issues identified included a mistake in the integration process and neglecting the correct vector field. After reevaluating the problem and correcting the derivative used, the user successfully arrived at the correct answer. The conversation highlights the importance of careful application of Green's Theorem and proper differentiation in solving line integrals.
hbomb
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble on a line integral.

Assuming that the closed curve C is taken in the counterclockwise sense. Use Green's Theorem.

\int_C F\bullet dR
where F=(x^2 + y^2)i + 3xy^2j
and C is the circle
x^2 + y^2 = 9

This is what I have done so far...

\int_0^{2\Pi} \int_0^3 \-r^2 rdrd\theta

\int_0^{2\Pi} \int_0^3 \-r^3 drd\theta

\int_0^{2\Pi} \frac{-r^4}{4} \\]_0^3d\theta

\int_0^{2\Pi} \frac{-81}{4} d\theta

\frac{-81}{4} \theta\\]_0^{2\Pi}

\frac{-81\Pi}{2}

The book gives the answer as \frac{243\Pi}{4}

I have no idea where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theres another form of Green's theorem that might be more appropriate for this problem, try looking for it in your textbook.

Also the integral of r^3 is not \frac{-r^4}{4} [/tex]. No negative.<br /> <br /> You&#039;ve also managed to neglect the vector field your integrating over.
 
Can you show the work as to how you got

\int_0^{2\Pi} \int_0^3 \-r^2 rdrd\theta

?
 
You've done something strange. Applying Green theorem should yield the equality

\int_C F\bullet dR = \iint_D \left(\frac{\partial (x^2+y^2)}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial (3xy^2)}{\partial x} \right) dxdy

and that's not

\int_0^{2\Pi} \int_0^3 \-r^2 rdrd\theta
 
Sorry guys, I was looking at another problem and I took the derivative of the wrong force. I redid this problem and I got the correct answer. Thanks for the attempted help though.
 
Np.. happens to me all the time :rolleyes:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top