Solving a Physics Problem: Calculating Ambulance Speed with Sound Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of an ambulance using the Doppler effect based on observed frequencies of its siren. The initial frequency heard is 560 Hz, and after passing, it drops to 480 Hz. The user applied the Doppler equation but calculated the ambulance's speed as 57.17 m/s, which contradicts the book's answer of 26.4 m/s. The confusion arises from the correct interpretation of the frequencies and the application of the Doppler formula. Clarification is sought on the proper use of the equation and the values for the source frequency.
pippermay
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Can someone please help me with the following problem:

Standing at a crosswalk, you hear a frequency of 560 Hz from the siren of an approaching ambulance. After the ambulance passes, the observed frequency of the siren is 480 Hz. Determine the ambulance's speed from these observations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done anything on this? What is the problem about, besides simply sound waves? That should help you to find an equation (or equations) you can use.
 
Last edited:
I have placed the information in the Doppler equation "I quess that it what it is called." Where the observed frequency (f') = 480 Hz, frequency (f) = 560 Hz, the velocity (v) = 343 m/s, the velocity of the observer (vo) = 0 m/s, and I am solving for the velocity of the ambulance's speed (vs).

f' = ((v - Vo)/(v + vs))f

vs = ((f(v-vo))/f') - v
vs = ((560(343-0))/(480)) - 343
vs = 57.17 m/s

I get the velocity of the ambulance to be 57.17 m/s, but according to the back of the book the correct answer is 26.4 m/s. I just don't understand what I am doing incorrectly.
 
You must have missed somethingi from the problem. 57.17 comes out correctly with the information you have given us. Maybe the equation is wrong?
 
560 is not the actual frequency of the source at rest it is also the apperent frequency when the amb is coming towards the observer...
 
I just wanted to say Thanks For helping me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top