Solving a Problem Using Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving an object moving up a board inclined at 30° while considering forces like gravity and friction. The poster initially attempted to apply Newton's second law and later explored using conservation of mechanical energy to find the friction coefficient (μ). They expressed confusion about their calculations and the lack of clarity in the problem statement regarding what needs to be calculated. The poster ultimately realized they were seeking μ, the friction constant, and outlined their approach to solving the problem. The thread highlights the challenges of understanding physics terminology and concepts while seeking assistance.
Nivoh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I apologize in advance for my lack of knowledge of "physics english".

First off, this is high school level. :)

I'm terribly sorry if this is confusing due to my lack of understand of the subject, the metric system, and my lack of grasp for the English language as well as terminology. What is μ?

Homework Statement




An object is moves up a flat board, the board forms an angle of 30° with the x-axis. During 0.76s, the object accelerates from 5m/s to 0. The only forces affecting the board is gravity and friction.

Homework Equations



ƩF=ma, R=μ*N, E=0.5mv^2+mgh, W=F*s.

The Attempt at a Solution




I initially solved this quite easily using ƩF=ma=mg*sin30°+μ*cos30°, where a=Δt/Δv.

Out of curiousity, I figured I could solve this using conservation of mechanical energy, as R is a constant force.

So I went ahead and used R=μ*N, R=E/s, where E is the mechanical energy lost due to friction. N=mg/cos30°, E=0.5mv^2-mgh, therefore μ=R/N=(0.5mv^2-mgh)*cos30°/mgs. s=1.9m, h=0.95m, g=9.81m/s^2, v=5m/s.

I seem however, to have failed, I wonder why? :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am sorry for being scum of the Earth and bumping my own post, but I really cannot rest without knowing what I've done wrong. Please let me know if my question is unclear, my English not sufficient to describe the problem, or if I'm not following guidelines.
 
Is it only me or is there no actual mention of what we have to calculate in this problem?
 
Rokas_P said:
Is it only me or is there no actual mention of what we have to calculate in this problem?

Duh, how silly of me, my apologies. Thank you for making me aware, was looking for μ, the friction constant.
 
The general outline of how I would approach this problem is this:

1. calculate acceleration
2. write down Newton's Second Law for this problem (here all the sines and cosines come in)
3. calculate μ (since μ is in R=μN)

Edit: I see that you're asking not about how to solve it but why you can't get the right answer when you try to solve it using another method. Hopefully someone can help you out with that :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top