Solving a Simple Pendulum Problem with Math

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a simple pendulum to swing from an initial angle of 8.0 degrees to 4.0 degrees on the opposite side. The initial calculations led to an incorrect time of 1.3 seconds due to a misunderstanding of the cosine function's values at specific angles. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly evaluating the inverse cosine and being cautious when working in degrees versus radians. The error was identified as misinterpreting the angle corresponding to -0.5 in the cosine function. Ultimately, clarity was achieved by recognizing that the pendulum had not completed half of its cycle when reaching the 4.0-degree mark.
Lord Anoobis
Messages
131
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A 100g mass on a 1.0m long string is pulled 8.0 degrees to one side and released. How long does it take for the pendulum to reach 4.0 degrees on the opposite side?

Homework Equations


##T = 2\pi \sqrt\frac{L}{g}##
##x(t) = A\cos\omega t##

The Attempt at a Solution


From the simple pendulum we get ##\omega = \sqrt\frac{g}{L}## which leads to:

##x(t) = A\cos\sqrt g t##

##A = 8.0## and ##x(t) = 4.0## can be substituted directly since it results in the cosine of an angle then:

##\cos\sqrt g t = -0.50##

##t\sqrt g = \frac{4\pi}{3}##

##t = 1.3s##

Which happens to be twice the actual answer. The only possibility for error I see is ##\arccos(-0.5)##.
What I don't see is why. My reasoning was that since we're looking at 4.0 degrees on the opposite side, the angle must be the second point where cosine is negative, ie. ##\frac{4\pi}{3}##. What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be careful working in degrees.

I think you've identified the error. How did you evaluate the inverse cosine?
 
PeroK said:
Why are you working in degrees?
Because in this case it makes no difference since the division results in a dimensionless figure.
 
Lord Anoobis said:
Because in this case it makes no difference since the division results in a dimensionless figure.

Yes, but I'd be careful. It's an easy way to go wrong. If you draw a graph of cos, you'll see where you've gone wrong.
 
PeroK said:
You need to be careful working in degrees.

I think you've identified the error. How did you evaluate the inverse cosine?
There are two possibilities for ##-0.5##, either ##\frac{2\pi}{3}## or ##\frac{4\pi}{3}##. I took the first figure to equate to 4.0 degrees on the side on which the swing started.
 
Lord Anoobis said:
There are two possibilities for ##-0.5##, either ##\frac{2\pi}{3}## or ##\frac{4\pi}{3}##. I took the first figure to equate to 4.0 degrees on the side on which the swing started.

Wouldn't that be where ##cos = 0.5##?
 
PeroK said:
Wouldn't that be where ##cos = 0.5##?
I'm sure that's not the case.
 
Lord Anoobis said:
I'm sure that's not the case.

Are you sure you're sure?

Can you say where the pendulum is when?

##cos(\omega t) = 1##
##cos(\omega t) = 0.5##
##cos(\omega t) = 0##
##cos(\omega t) = -0.5##
##cos(\omega t) = -1##

(All for the first time)
 
PeroK said:
Are you sure you're sure?

Can you say where the pendulum is when?

##cos(\omega t) = 1##
##cos(\omega t) = 0.5##
##cos(\omega t) = 0##
##cos(\omega t) = -0.5##
##cos(\omega t) = -1##

(All for the first time)
I just noticed there's a typo in my initial post. It's supposed to be ##x(t) = -4.0## That's where the negative sign comes from.
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
Are you sure you're sure?

Can you say where the pendulum is when?

##cos(\omega t) = 1##
##cos(\omega t) = 0.5##
##cos(\omega t) = 0##
##cos(\omega t) = -0.5##
##cos(\omega t) = -1##

(All for the first time)
I see what you mean here. The pendulum in question hasn't even completed one half of a full cycle. ##\frac{4\pi}{3}## is when it reaches 4.0 for the second time.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top