Solving an Accelerating Car's Revolutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial angular velocity, angular acceleration, and total revolutions of a car coming to a stop over 96 meters. The initial angular velocity was determined to be 80 rad/s, and the time taken to stop was calculated as 9.6 seconds, leading to an angular acceleration of 8.3 rad/s. The initial revolutions per second were found to be 12.7, but the participant recognized that this rate would decrease as the car decelerates. A suggestion was made to calculate total revolutions by considering the number of wheel circumferences that fit into the total distance traveled. The conversation also touched on the complexities of measuring revolutions for objects like a ball moving through the air, highlighting the challenges of establishing a relationship between distance and revolutions without a fixed surface.
jjones1573
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car is coming to a top over a distance of 96m

Vi = 20m/s
r = 25cm

find the intial angular velocity, angular acceleration, total revolutions

Homework Equations


w = v / r
angular acceleration = change in w / t
d = (Vi + Vf / 2) t


The Attempt at a Solution



So for the initial angular velocity I did w = v / r
= 20m/s / 0.25m
= 80 rad/s

then I calculated the time based on displacement d = (Vi + Vf / 2) t
therefore t = d / (Vi + Vf / 2)
= 96 / 10
= 9.6s

So that I could find angular acceleration = change in w / t
= 80 / 9.6
= 8.3 rad/s

I THINK that's right so far

and for revolutions I did 80rad/s / 2phi
to get 12.7 rev/s

but then this is only the rate of rev/s at t=0 . This would decrease as the car deccelerates right? So how can I find the overal number of revolutions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jjones1573 said:
So how can I find the overal number of revolutions?

If you assume that the wheel doesn't slip on the road surface, then you should be able to count the number of wheel circumferences that go into the total distance.
 
Ah of course! that makes sense. What about in an instance where a ball is moving through the air, how could you measure the revolutions?
 
jjones1573 said:
Ah of course! that makes sense. What about in an instance where a ball is moving through the air, how could you measure the revolutions?

Without non-slip contact with a surface there's no obvious way to fix a relationship between distance and revolutions -- the wheel could have any rotational velocity independent of linear speed.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top