Solving an Ensemble of Particles Wave Function Problem

leoflindall
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
b]1. Homework Statement [/b]

I have the soloution to this question, but am confused as to what has been done between each step between lines 2,3,4. Can anyone explain how they have been simplified (espicially what happened to the operator) and what the value of the intergral is? I think I am just missing something here...

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Leo

The Question and solution are as follows,

Suppose, an ensemble of particles of mass, M, is prepared in a state as below

The Wave function = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} cos (\frac{\Pi x}{L} Between L/2 and -L/2, and is 0 otherwise.

Evaluate the expectation value {H} \psi for an energy measurement on an en-
semble of particles prepared in \psi (x)


The Solution

The soloution is shown in the reply below, for somereason, it wouldn't write it all out here. Exscuse the poor latex. PLease also note that h= h bar and the intergral is between limits of L/2 and -L/2


Cheers Guys!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


{H} = \frac{2}{L}\intcos( \frac{x\Pi}{L} )( \frac{P^2}{2M} )cos(\frac{x\Pi}{L} .dx

= \frac{1}{ML}\intcos(\frac{x\Pi}{L})(-ihd/dx)cos(\frac{x\Pi}{L}) .dx

= \frac{h^{2}}{ML} ( \frac{\Pi^{2}}{L^{2}} ) \int cos^{2} ( \frac{\Pi x}{L} ) .dx

= \frac{h^{2} \Pi^{2}}{2ML^{2}}
 


In quantum mechanics momentum is an operator defined by

\mathbf{p}=i\hbar\nabla\rightarrow p=i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

for a 1D problem. Since you have p^2, this gives you

\mathbf{p}^2=-\hbar^2\nabla^2\rightarrow p^2=-\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}

So between lines 1 and 2, you have that (and you were missing a squared term)

\langle H\rangle=-\frac{\hbar^2}{ML}\int\cos\left[\frac{\pi x}{L}\right]\cdot\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\cos\left[\frac{\pi x}{L}\right]dx

You should know that the second derivative of cosine gives you

\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\cos[\alpha x]=-\alpha\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sin[\alpha x]=-\alpha^2\cos[\alpha x]

Using this between 2 and 3, you get

\langle H\rangle=\frac{\hbar^2}{ML}\,\frac{\pi^2}{L^2}\int\cos^2\left[\frac{\pi x}{L}\right]dx

Performing this integral gives

\langle H\rangle=\frac{\hbar^2}{ML}\,\frac{\pi^2}{L^2}\cdot\left(\frac{\sin\left[2\pi x/L\right]}{4\cdot\pi/L}+\frac{x}{2}\right)

Which, evaluating at the limits of +L/2 and -L/2, we get

\langle H\rangle=\frac{\hbar^2}{ML}\,\frac{\pi^2}{L^2}\cdot\frac{L}{2}

Which reduces to

\langle H\rangle=\frac{\pi^2\hbar^2}{2ML^2}
 


That makes perfect sense! I think it was a stupid error on my part, missing out the squared term on the operator threw me off.

Thanks for your help!

Leo
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top