Solving an equation with respect to y, where y is twice [hard]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Science4ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Science4ver
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Science4ver said:

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?

Now that you have it over a common denominator, if f(y)/g(y)=0, then f(y)=0.
 
Dick said:
Now that you have it over a common denominator, if f(y)/g(y)=0, then f(y)=0.

Thank you for your answer.

That implies that I need to solve the equation

(y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2)) = 0

Which allows me to arrive at the solution (using my graphical calculator)

y = -b * p *(sqrt(-1/(p^2-1)

But solution is suppose to be:

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1))

I can't quite comprehend which step I need to use arrive at that solution. But cause to the best of my knowledge there aren't any variables which I substitute in order to arrive at that solution.

Any idears?
 
You aren't going to get there by being sloppy and relying on a calculator.

Science4ver said:
Thank you for your answer.

That implies that I need to solve the equation

(y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2)) = 0

There's an extra 'p' in that equation.

Science4ver said:
Which allows me to arrive at the solution (using my graphical calculator)

y = -b * p *(sqrt(-1/(p^2-1)

Extra 'p' here also, and what happened to the 't'? I think you should fix those up and figure out how your calculator found that expression before continuing.
 
Dick said:
You aren't going to get there by being sloppy and relying on a calculator.



There's an extra 'p' in that equation.



Extra 'p' here also, and what happened to the 't'? I think you should fix those up and figure out how your calculator found that expression before continuing.

You are right. I see now the equation I am suppose to solve is y/(t*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))-1 = 0

Is it correct now?
 
Science4ver said:
You are right. I see now the equation I am suppose to solve is y/(t*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))-1 = 0

Is it correct now?

No, the p is gone. Your first step of putting it over a common denominator is wrong. It happened when you expressed the term 1/p with that common denominator.
 
Last edited:
So I am lost here :( What would you surgest I do as a first step with original equation? I can add 1/p on both sides I see that and next add the denominator on both sides. But what next?
 
Science4ver said:
So I am lost here :( What would you surgest I do as a first step with original equation? I can add 1/p on both sides I see that and next add the denominator on both sides. But what next?

The strategy is to do what you were doing. Express X(y) over a common denominator. But do it right.
 
Dick said:
The strategy is to do what you were doing. Express X(y) over a common denominator. But do it right.

I get that now but the only commen denominator I can deduce is my pee size brain is :)

p*t*(b^2+y^2))

But what I get from what you are saying is that denominator is wrong?
 
  • #10
Science4ver said:
I get that now but the only commen denominator I can deduce is my pee size brain is :)

p*t*(b^2+y^2))

But what I get from what you are saying is that denominator is wrong?

I would use p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) as a common denominator. Actually that's what I thought you were using and just forgetting the 'sqrt' part. If you have two fraction a/b-c/d you can always use c*d as a common denominator. What do you get expressing a/b-c/d over a common denominator?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
No. Denominator is fine. You got ((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) = 0. One of the terms in the numerator of that expression is wrong.

Okay, Glad I am not totally stupid then :)

So any if I take the original equation : y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

and use the commen denominator p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)

I arrive at

py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?

But if that the right cause of action I still have y twice with the term y^2 and y, and no matter what I do I can't arrive at the result that

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) :( So I understand I must be doing something wrong and there possibly a term which can be rewritten to arrive that the right result for y, but I can't see which one :(
 
  • #12
Science4ver said:
Okay, Glad I am not totally stupid then :)

So any if I take the original equation : y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

and use the commen denominator p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)

I arrive at

py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?

But if that the right cause of action I still have y twice with the term y^2 and y, and no matter what I do I can't arrive at the result that

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) :( So I understand I must be doing something wrong and there possibly a term which can be rewritten to arrive that the right result for y, but I can't see which one :(

Sorry, I've been assuming that some of the things you were writing were typos, when they are actually algebra mistakes. I revised the post you quoted. I'm asking you to show me how to put a/b-c/d over a common denominator.
 
  • #13
Science4ver said:
py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?
You confused me dropping the '0' at the end of the first of those two lines.
You have dropped a p in getting to the last line.
Don't collect everything over on the left like that. Leave it as py = (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)).
You next step is to get rid of the square root. How can you do that?
 
  • #14
Dick said:
Sorry, I've been assuming that some of the things you were writing were typos, when they are actually algebra mistakes. I revised the post you quoted. I'm asking you to show me how to put a/b-c/d over a common denominator.

Thats easy a/b - c/d = ad/bd - bc/bd = (ad-bc)/bd

But regarding the other expression I attempted now 10 times if I take my equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p = 0

and use the commen denominator (p*t(b^2+y^2))

I end up with the expression:

py/(pt*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - (t(b^2+y^2))
/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = ?

I must have messed up somewhere :( ?
 
  • #15
Science4ver said:
Thats easy a/b - c/d = ad/bd - bc/bd = (ad-bc)/bd

But regarding the other expression I attempted now 10 times if I take my equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p = 0

and use the commen denominator (p*t(b^2+y^2))

I end up with the expression:

py/(pt*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - (t(b^2+y^2))
/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = ?

I must have messed up somewhere :( ?

a/b-c/d=(ad-bc)/bd is correct. You are messing up the second part. Actually, looking at it, it's not messed up - but you don't have a common denominator. Just apply the correct pattern with a=y, b=t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)), c=1 and d=p.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Science4ver said:

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?

Your equation is
\frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}}-\frac{1}{p} = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}} = \frac{1}{p}
Square both sides to get
\frac{y^2}{t^2(b^2+y^2)} = \frac{1}{p^2}
Solve for ##y^2##; in other words, let ##y^2 = z## and solve for ##z## from the simple equation
\frac{z}{b^2 t^2 + t^2 z} = \frac{1}{p^2}
 
  • #17
Yes, I know there is an easier way to attack this. You can also do it by putting everything over a common denominator and going from there. I was trying to diagose what was going so wrong with the OP's attempt to put things over a common denominator. Sometimes you have to do that. Here, it's optional.
 
  • #18
Ray Vickson said:
Your equation is
\frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}}-\frac{1}{p} = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}} = \frac{1}{p}
Square both sides to get
\frac{y^2}{t^2(b^2+y^2)} = \frac{1}{p^2}
Solve for ##y^2##; in other words, let ##y^2 = z## and solve for ##z## from the simple equation
\frac{z}{b^2 t^2 + t^2 z} = \frac{1}{p^2}
thank and then I should be able to arrive at the solution ?
But if I solve the rewritten equation with respect to z I get z=-b^2*t^2/(t^2-p^2)?

I am no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) which is suppose to be the solution for original equation.

Which is still no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1))
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Science4ver said:
I get z=-b^2*t^2/(t^2-p^2)?

I am no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) which is suppose to be the solution for original equation.
Yes you are... almost there in fact. Just a little more juggling.
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
Yes you are... almost there in fact. Just a little more juggling.

I got it now :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top