Solving Analytic Function: F(x) Expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter asi123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
asi123
Messages
254
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hey guys.
I'm pretty much stuck on this one.
The question is, is there an analytic function F(x) which fulfill the expression in the pic? (I'm sure I messed up the English, sorry :confused:)

Thanks


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 422
Physics news on Phys.org
Integrate by letting u= z2+ 4.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Integrate by letting u= z2+ 4.
I need to Integrate this thing in order to find the function?
What do you mean by "letting u= z2+ 4"?

Thanks a lot.
 
asi123 said:
I need to Integrate this thing in order to find the function?
What do you mean by "letting u= z2+ 4"?

Thanks a lot.

Integration by substitution?
 
Gregg said:
Integration by substitution?

Oh, ok so I got half Ln of something, is that the function? seems too easy...

Thanks a lot.
 
But does log(z^2+4) define an analytic function on the plane minus those two points? Can you pick values of the log that make it continuous everywhere? What happens with the 'function' log(z) as you move in a circle around the origin?
 
Dick said:
But does log(z^2+4) define an analytic function on the plane minus those two points? Can you pick values of the log that make it continuous everywhere? What happens with the 'function' log(z) as you move in a circle around the origin?

Yeah right, it's not analytic unless you take off the entire x negative axis.
So does that mean that such analytic function does not exist?

Thanks a lot.
 
asi123 said:
Yeah right, it's not analytic unless you take off the entire x negative axis.
So does that mean that such analytic function does not exist?

Thanks a lot.

That's the general picture, yes. You can write the antiderivative as log(z+2i)+log(z-2i). You have exactly the same kind of problem as log(z) has around the points +/-2i.
 
Dick said:
That's the general picture, yes. You can write the antiderivative as log(z+2i)+log(z-2i). You have exactly the same kind of problem as log(z) has around the points +/-2i.

Ok, Thanks.
 
Back
Top