Solving Arctan(x/y) - 90degrees

  • Thread starter Thread starter flexifirm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the equation arctan(x/y) - 90 degrees = -arctan(y/x). The concept involves visualizing a right triangle where arctan(x/y) represents the angle opposite side x. Subtracting 90 degrees from this angle results in the negative of the angle opposite side y. The problem is noted as challenging but becomes clearer with visualization. This mathematical relationship is relevant in fields like electrical engineering.
flexifirm
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
This is fun...

prove that:

arctan(x/y) - 90degrees = -arctan(y/x)

I had to do this recently for an electrical engineering problem (in an interview actually). It's ahrd at first, but once you picture things it comes fast.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
arctan(x/y) is the angle of a right triangle opposite x, so subtract 90 degrees and you're going to get the negative (since the first angle is less than 90) of the angle opposite side y.

Did you have to do that on the spot in your head? Sounds like a good question.

cookiemonster
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top