Solving Biot-Savarts Law for Finite Thickness Current Loops

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Biot-Savart's law to a current loop with finite thickness, specifically questioning how to accurately account for this thickness in the magnetic field calculation. The standard formula for the magnetic field on the axis of a loop assumes infinitesimal thickness, which raises concerns about its accuracy for real-world applications. One suggested approach is to model the thick coil as multiple narrow coils connected in parallel, allowing for a more precise integration. Additionally, there is a query regarding a potential missing factor of 2π in the equation provided. The conversation highlights a gap in standard electrodynamics resources, such as Griffiths' textbook, regarding this topic.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

When solving Biot-Savarts law for a current loop of radius R, the magnetic field on the axis of the loop is given by (in Tesla)
<br /> B(z) = \mu_0I\frac{R^2}{(R^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}<br />
where I is the current through the loop. However, this derivation assumes that the loop has an infinitesimal thickness. But how is the "proper" way to take into account the fact that a current loops has a finite thickness?

My book on Electrodynamics (Griffiths) does not address this issue, and it is something I have thought about for some time.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
Hi

When solving Biot-Savarts law for a current loop of radius R, the magnetic field on the axis of the loop is given by (in Tesla)
<br /> B(z) = \mu_0I\frac{R^2}{(R^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}<br />
where I is the current through the loop. However, this derivation assumes that the loop has an infinitesimal thickness. But how is the "proper" way to take into account the fact that a current loops has a finite thickness?

My book on Electrodynamics (Griffiths) does not address this issue, and it is something I have thought about for some time.


Niles.

I suppose by carrying out a more sophisticated integration where,perhaps,the thick coil can be considered as a number of narrow coils connected side by side and making good electrical contact with each other.

(Is your equation missing a 2pi?)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top