Solving Brightness Equation with Procyon: 7L☉ and 11.41 light years

  • Thread starter Thread starter vbillej
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity Solar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the brightness of the star Procyon using the formula Brightness = Luminosity/4πr². Procyon has a luminosity of 7L☉ and is located 11.41 light years away. The correct calculation yields a brightness of approximately 0.004 L☉ watts per square light year. Participants clarify that L☉ represents a unit of solar luminosity, and the numerical value should not be directly input into a calculator as a single entity. The confusion stemmed from misplacing the values in the equation, which was resolved with proper guidance.
vbillej
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In a question is says that Brightness = Luminosity/4πr₂ (for a star).

Procyon = 7L☉ and 11.41 light years as distance.

the equation in B= 7L☉/ 4π(11.41)₂

the answer turned out to be 0.004 L☉ watts per square light year (its a textbook question). What i don't understand is what is 7L☉, what's its value. I read that L☉ is approx the suns luminosity so i did 7(3.839 × 10^26). but still getting the wrong answer.

Thanks

vbillej
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
vbillej said:
In a question is says that Brightness = Luminosity/4πr₂ (for a star).

Procyon = 7L☉ and 11.41 light years as distance.

the equation in B= 7L☉/ 4π(11.41)₂

the answer turned out to be 0.004 L☉ watts per square light year (its a textbook question). What i don't understand is what is 7L☉, what's its value. I read that L☉ is approx the suns luminosity so i did 7(3.839 × 10^26). but still getting the wrong answer.

Thanks

vbillej

I don't exactly understand what the problem is.
 
I just don't get what 7L☉ is, i looked up L☉ but i still don't really understand how the answer was 0.004 L☉.

Like how would i put 7L☉ into a calculator.
 
L☉ is just a unit, specifically, the unit solar luminosity. Its value is defined to be the luminosity of the sun. You don't put 7L☉ into a calculator any more than you put 7 meters or 7 seconds into a calculator, you only calculate the numbers, the units are your responsibility.
The equation you mentioned has units of L☉/ly^2, which is exactly what you wanted, is it not?
 
vbillej said:
I just don't get what 7L☉ is, i looked up L☉ but i still don't really understand how the answer was 0.004 L☉.

Like how would i put 7L☉ into a calculator.

Read the answer carefully.
7 is the AMOUNT L is the UNITS. This means how luminous the object is compared to the currently accepted luminosity of our Sun. You are correct in your conversion from solar luminosity to just get the luminosity for the star but you don't need to do that.

The stars brightness or its flux is given by the equation:

f=\frac{L}{4\pi d^2}

So you are given the stars luminosity and its distance plug that into the equation and you get appox. 0.00428092 (using google to calculate). Your units would be L Watts per squared light year... which is what is in the back of the textbook.

and I've noticed that while I was fixing some problems with my latexing Nabeshin had already answered you :P
 
Thanks guys, i found out that i put 7L☉/ 4π(11.41)₂ as a fraction in the calculator... -_- haha


thank your very much for your help

vbillej
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top