Solving Carbon Nanotube Model with Lz & Ly Expectation Values

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Im doing a problem with a simple model of a carbon nanotube. In this we have an electron which is bound to the surface of a cylinder from which there is a radially outpointing electric field.
We choose to put the x-axis along the axis of the cylinder such that the coordinate describing rotation around the cylinder is directly related to its angular momentum.
Now I am asked to argue that the expectation value of Lz and Ly are 0 with a physical argument. I am not sure how to approach this. Only thing I can see is that the system is symmetric under rotation around the x-axis, but I don't see where this leads me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A non-zero Lz or Ly would point in some specific direction, and ruin your symmetry.
 
but this isn't exactly as non-zero Lz or Ly it is a non-zero expectation value.. I don't completely understand I must admit - can you elaborate? :)
 
I meant a non-zero expectation value in my post. This would break symmetry: You would get a preferred direction (the direction of the spin expectation value) instead of your symmetric setup.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top