Solving Collision of Billiard Balls: Speed and Direction

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about the collision of two billiard balls, one is shot east at 2.6 m/s and the other west at 0.8 m/s, resulting in a glancing collision that deflects the second ball north at 1.58 m/s. Participants calculated the final speed and direction of the first ball, emphasizing the importance of considering both x and y components of motion. The correct approach involved using the Pythagorean theorem to find the resultant speed after determining the components. The final speed of the first ball was calculated to be approximately 2.395 m/s, with the direction specified as 41.276 degrees south of east. The discussion highlighted the need for careful consideration of vector components in collision problems.
aligass2004
Messages
236
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Similar to the other one...
On billiard ball is shot east at 2.6m/s. A second, identical billiard ball is shot west at .8m/s. The balls have a glancing collision, not a head-on collision, deflecting the second ball by 90 degrees and sending it north at 1.58m/s. What are the speed and direction of the first ball after the collision?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using (P1x)f + (P2x)f = (P1x)i + (P2x)i ----> (m1xv1x)f + (m2xv2x)f = (m1xv1x)i + (m2xv2x)i. I tried solving for (v1x)f. I assumed since the billiard balls are identical that the mass cancels out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, the masses cancel. Looks like you have the right idea. can you show your calculations?
 
V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f
= 2.6 + .8 - 1.58 = 1.82
 
aligass2004 said:
V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f
= 2.6 + .8 - 1.58 = 1.82

but 1.58 is not in the x-direction... what is the Vxf of the second ball?
 
I didn't realize that. The Vxf of the 2nd ball is zero since it isn't moving in the x direction anymore.
 
aligass2004 said:
I didn't realize that. The Vxf of the 2nd ball is zero since it isn't moving in the x direction anymore.

exactly.
 
Ok, so I tried V1f = 2.6 + .8 = 3.4, but that wasn't right.
 
aligass2004 said:
Ok, so I tried V1f = 2.6 + .8 = 3.4, but that wasn't right.

Oh, sorry I didn't notice... you should have -0.8, not 0.8.

use east positive. west negative. north positive. south negative.
 
Alright, this time I tried V1f = 2.6 - .8 = 1.8, but it again wasn't right.
 
  • #10
aligass2004 said:
Alright, this time I tried V1f = 2.6 - .8 = 1.8, but it again wasn't right.

that's only in the east west direction... you also need to consider the north south direction.

I thought the question was asking for the components separately. I just noticed now it only asks for speed. I'm sorry... wish I realized before you submitted again...

get the north south component, same way you got the east/west component... then get the speed using pythagorean theorem.
 
  • #11
Blah...freaking components. Ok, for the north/south component, V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f -----> V1f = 0 + 0 -1.58. There's only one problem with using the pythagorean theroem. With the last problem, I figured out the angle really easily since both components were the same. I don't know the angle with this one.
 
  • #12
aligass2004 said:
Blah...freaking components. Ok, for the north/south component, V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f -----> V1f = 0 + 0 -1.58. There's only one problem with using the pythagorean theroem. With the last problem, I figured out the angle really easily since both components were the same. I don't know the angle with this one.

you can get the angle using arctan(vy/vx). be careful before you submit though... how do they ask for the angle? Do they want the angle from the east axis etc..?
 
  • #13
They ask for degrees in the south east direction.
 
  • #14
So the angle would be -41.276 degrees, but it would be positive since they want it in the SE direction, right?
 
  • #15
aligass2004 said:
So the angle would be -41.276 degrees, but it would be positive since they want it in the SE direction, right?

yeah, but it is East 41.276 degrees South...

Do they just say SE... because it could be east of south or south of east... that makes a difference...
 
  • #16
It says south of east
 
  • #17
aligass2004 said:
It says south of east

Cool. Then 41.276 is right.
 
  • #18
Ok so the angle was right, but I don't know the velocity...and I'm out of tries. I tried the -1.58 = vcos(theta).
 
  • #19
aligass2004 said:
Ok so the angle was right, but I don't know the velocity...and I'm out of tries. I tried the -1.58 = vcos(theta).

The 1.58 is the sin. so vsin(41.276) = 1.58. v = 2.395m/s.

But it's best to just use the pythagorean theorem when you need the speed... you don't need to worry about the angles. sqrt(1.58^2 + (1.8)^2) = 2.395m/s
 
  • #20
Alright.
 
Back
Top