Solving Complex Eigenvalues Homework

Totalderiv
Messages
69
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Apply the eigenvalue method to find a general solution of the given system.
x_1' = 5x_1 - 9x_2
x_2' = 2x_1 - x_2


Homework Equations


(A-λI)v=0


The Attempt at a Solution


x_1' = 5x_1 - 9x_2
x_2' = 2x_1 - x_2

\left[ <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> 5-λ &amp; -9\\ <br /> 2 &amp; -1-λ <br /> \end{array} <br /> \right]=(5-λ)(-1-λ)+18=0
λ^2-4λ-13=0
(λ-2)^2 -9=0
λ=2+3i,\overline{λ}=2-3i
So I plugged λ into the matrix;
\left[ <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> 3-3i &amp; -9\\ <br /> 2 &amp; -3-3i <br /> \end{array} <br /> \right]<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> a\\<br /> b<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]=(3-3i)a-9b=0<br /> 2a-(3+3i)b=0
This is where I'm stuck...the answer is;
x_1(t)=3e^{2t}(c_1cos2t - 5c_2sin2t)
x_2(t)=e^{2t}[(c_1+c_2)cos3t + (c_1-c_2)sin3t)]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any one?
 
Totalderiv said:

Homework Statement


Apply the eigenvalue method to find a general solution of the given system.
x_1&#039; = 5x_1 - 9x_2
x_2&#039; = 2x_1 - x_2


Homework Equations


(A-λI)v=0


The Attempt at a Solution


x_1&#039; = 5x_1 - 9x_2
x_2&#039; = 2x_1 - x_2

\left[ <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> 5-λ &amp; -9\\ <br /> 2 &amp; -1-λ <br /> \end{array} <br /> \right]=(5-λ)(-1-λ)+18=0
λ^2-4λ-13=0
(λ-2)^2 -9=0
λ=2+3i,\overline{λ}=2-3i
This is your error. (\lambda- 2)^2- 9= 0 is equivalent to (\lambda- 2)^2= 9 so \lambda- 2= \pm 3. There is no "i".

So I plugged λ into the matrix;
\left[ <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> 3-3i &amp; -9\\ <br /> 2 &amp; -3-3i <br /> \end{array} <br /> \right]<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> a\\<br /> b<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]=(3-3i)a-9b=0<br /> 2a-(3+3i)b=0
This is where I'm stuck...the answer is;
x_1(t)=3e^{2t}(c_1cos2t - 5c_2sin2t)
x_2(t)=e^{2t}[(c_1+c_2)cos3t + (c_1-c_2)sin3t)]
There are no eigenvectors because 2+ 3i and 2- 3i are not eigenvalues.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top