Solving Complex Equation: z^4 + 1/2(1 - i3^(1/2)) = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlanPartr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the complex equation z^4 + 1/2(1 - i3^(1/2)) = 0. The equation can be rewritten as z^4 = (1 - √3i)/2, which simplifies the problem. Converting to polar form, the expression becomes r = 1 and θ = π/3. The fourth roots can then be calculated, leading to roots expressed in exponential form, specifically e^(π/12). The conversation highlights the importance of polar representation in finding complex roots efficiently.
AlanPartr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Im a first year physics student and am having trouble with this question on complex numbers, any help would be greatly appreciated:

find all the roots of the following equation:

z^4 + 1/2(1 - i3^(1/2)) = 0

I know that z can be expressed as an exponential, but I don't know how or even if it helps. I tried doing it with normal algebra but you get to a stage where you have to find the 4th root of i.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
just read the post above this, sorry I am in the wrong place
 
z4- 1/2(1 - i3^(1/2)) =
z^4- \frac{1}{2}(1- \sqrt{3}i= 0
is the same as
z^4= \frac{1- \sqrt{3}i}{2}]

The best way to solve that is to convert to "polar form":
\frac{1}{2}- \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}
becomes
r= 1, θ= π/3 or
cos(\frac{\pi}{3})+ i sin(\frac{\pi}{3})
or
e^{\frac{\pi}{3}}

the fourth root of that has r= 11/4= 1 and &theta= π/12:
cos(\frac{\pi}{12}+ i sin(\frac{\pi}{12}
or
e^{\frac{\pi}{12}}
which, according to my calculator is abpout 0.9659+ 0.2588i.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cube root of 1 is \omega=\frac{-1+\sqrt(-3)}{2} which is what we get when we transpose it opposite z^4.
However, \omega =\omega^4. So we need only look at \omega times 1, -1, i, -i.

In fact, it can be seen by raising to the fourth power that \omega^4-\omega=0.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top