Solving Delta Potential Barrier Problem with Schrodinger Equation

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In delta potential barrier problem Schrodinger equation we get

\psi(x)=Ae^{kx}, x<0

\psi(x)=Ae^{-kx}, x>0

We must get solution of

lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{d\psi}{dx}|^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon} and get the solution

I can say that the whole function is

\psi(x)=Ae^{-k|x|}

I don't have first derivative in 0.

lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{0}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx+lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{0}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=0Why I don't get same solution different then zero like in case

lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{d\psi}{dx}|^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}

?

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I'd like to point out how disappointed I was when I clicked on this thread and found that it wasn't a Chuck Norris movie:biggrin:

Petar Mali said:
I can say that the whole function is

\psi(x)=Ae^{-k|x|}

I don't have first derivative in 0.
No you cant. The wavefunction \psi(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{lr}Ae^{kx}, &amp; x&lt;0 \\ Ae^{-kx}, &amp; x&gt;0\end{array}\right.[/itex] is undefined at x=0 (as it should be for a delta function potential). The wavefunction \psi(x)=Ae^{-k|x|} <b>is</b> defined at x=0; the two wavefunctions are not equivalent.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{0}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx+lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{0}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=0Why I don&#039;t get same solution different then zero like in case </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> I don&#039;t see how you are getting zero for that limit. Show the rest of your steps.
 
Last edited:
<br /> lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{0}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx+lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{0}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=0<br />

lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{0}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx+lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{0}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0}\frac{d\psi}{dx}|^{0}_{-\epsilon}+lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0}\frac{d\psi}{dx}|^{\epsilon}_{0}<br />

\frac{d\psi}{dx}=kAe^{kx} for x&lt;0

\frac{d\psi}{dx}=-kAe^{-kx} for x&gt;0

lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{0}_{-\epsilon}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx+lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int^{\epsilon}_{0}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx=<br /> kA-lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0}kAe^{k\epsilon}-lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0}kAe^{-k\epsilon}+kA=2kA-2kA=0
 
Double check your exponentials (hint hint) and maybe expand them out ignoring terms higher than \epsilon^1
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top