Solving Diff Eq Tired Spring Problem: Find Min k for y(x) Cross y=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter andre_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq Spring
andre_4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the minimum positive value of the constant k needed to ensure that the function y(x) obeying

x^2 y'' + K y = 0, y(1) = 0, y'(1)=1

will not simply keep on increasing toward large x but will instead return to cross y=o ocassionally

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I've tried doing a change of variable and trnasform t= ln(X). The idea is that I should get a constant coefficient equation but do not know how to get there yet.
I have tried using the chain rule twice to get from d^2y/dx^2 to d^2y/dt^2 but as said I do not seem to make any progress. Any ideas please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the trial solution y=x^m
 
That's an "Euler type" equation. As rock.freak667 said, you can reduce to the "characteristic equation" by trying y= xm. However, I suspect that equation will have complex solutions and it's not clear how to reduce that to real solutions to the d.e.

Yes, you can always reduce an "Euler type" equation to a constant coefficients equation by the substitution t= ln(x). You use the chain rule to change:
\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{dy}{dt}\frac{dt}{dx}= \frac{1}{t}\frac{dy}{dt}
\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}= \frac{d }{dx}\left(\frac{1}{t}\frac{dy}{dt}\right)
= \frac{1}{t}\frac{d }{dt}\left(\frac{1}{t}\frac{dy}{dt}\right)
In fact, the characteristic equation for the constant coefficients equation you get this way is exactly the same as the equation you get by trying y= xm but now you know that t= ln(x) so you can see what to do with complex solutions- exactly what you would do for a constant coefficients equation and then replace t by ln(x).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top