Solving Einstein's Field Equation: The Schwarschild Metric & Beyond

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimeRip496
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Metric
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
What is the next easiest solution to einstein field equation after the schwarschild metric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Schwarzschild solution is not the easiest. Minkowski space is.
 
Last edited:
Orodruin said:
The Schwarzschild solution is not the easiest. Minkowski space is.
Sorry for my mistake. But what is easier after schwarschild solution? Something that involves using efe as it will help me better understand it.
 
This depends on what you mean by "easy" and what you wish to understand. The FRW metric is a good example which will also help you if you at some point want to study cosmology.
 

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Thread 'Relativator (Circular Slide-Rule): Simulated with Desmos - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
View full post »

Thread 'Hawking After 54 Years Confirmed: BH surfaces don't shrink'

Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Does the metric in general relativity depend only on position because of the equivalence principle?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I How to get metric field using a path dependent parallel propagator
Replies
24
Views
1K
I Piecewise Functions in the Einstein Field Equations
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
I Einstein Field Eqns: East/West Coast Metrics
Replies
6
Views
2K
On the order of indices of the Christoffel symbol of the 1st kind
Replies
19
Views
2K
I A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##
2
Replies
69
Views
1K
A The "no metric, no nothing" view
Replies
2
Views
997
I A question about metric compatibility equation
2
Replies
62
Views
6K
A Second Order Metric: Manipulating & Calculations for Einstein Equations
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Numerical Relativity -- Software to solve the Einstein field equations?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top