How Do You Solve for I in a Series of Beam Deflection Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattaddis
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the moment of inertia (I) in a series of beam deflection equations. The original poster, Matt, seeks assistance in rearranging equations to find the total deflection of a beam under specific boundary conditions. A participant suggests factoring I out of the equations since it appears in the denominator, which leads to a successful solution for Matt. The exchange highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical expressions and the common challenges faced in engineering calculations. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes collaboration in problem-solving within technical discussions.
mattaddis
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I need some help rearranging a combination of equations and was wondering if someone could help? I am attempting to find the sum of the deflection in a beam, but to do so for the boundary conditions require a total of four formulas in series.

I need to solve the attached equation for I, which is common throughout.

I hope someone can help.

Thanks in advance.

Matt
 

Attachments

  • equation.JPG
    equation.JPG
    9.3 KB · Views: 460
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but the only place I see ##I## is in the denominator of each summand.
So can't you just factor it out?
$$\sum \delta = \frac{1}{24 E I} \left\{ \vphantom{\frac{W_1}{E I}} \cdots \right\}$$
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
CompuChip,

Thanks for that. I feel a bit thick now. It worked and I got the desired solution.

Matt
 
No problem, we all make those mistakes.
I was just afraid that you were going to say "Oh, I forgot to mention that the I1,2,3 are the components of I", or "W depends on I" or something nasty like that :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top