MHB Solving equation with 2 variables. (time sensitive)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mywork5000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a two-variable algebra word problem involving Ashlee's jewelry sales. The equation modeled is 6a + 12b = 168, where 'a' represents bracelets and 'b' represents necklaces. The user successfully isolates 'b' as b = 14 - 0.5a but struggles to find unique solutions due to the lack of a second equation. It is concluded that while multiple combinations of 'a' and 'b' exist, the problem primarily asks for 'b' in terms of 'a'. The final confirmation is that the user's work is correct, and they are not alone in their confusion.
Mywork5000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i am a 50 year old man, lovingly arguing with my 12 year old niece who has an algebra word problem. we're stumped (I'M stumped) -- and would love to get some help. CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME SOLVE THIS "2 VARIABLE" PROBLEM ASAP (need it by 6am pacific time on 10/7/14). thanks! PROBLEM: Ashlee makes beaded jewelry. She charges 6dollars for a bracelet and 12dollars for a necklace. She earned $168. Let "a" equal the number of bracelets and "b" equal the number of necklaces.
Problem #1: write an equation to model the situation.
Problem #2: Solve for "b".

re #1, my answer is: 6(a) + 12(b) = 168. (correct?)
re #2, I'm stumped. the way I'm TRYING to solve is to isolate "b" (aka, the number of necklaces she sold) on one side of the equation. I'm going like this:
step 1: 6(a) + 12(b) = 168
step 2: divide all groups by 12, giving me
step 3: .5(a) + b = 14. then
step 4: b = 14 - .5(a)
at this point, i hit a wall.
my niece says it can't be answered. i say, they wouldn't put it in the book if it couldn't be answered. THOUGHTS? THANKS!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your work is correct...I get:

$$b=\frac{28-a}{2}$$

which is equivalent to your solution.

Now, since we are not given another equation, such as the total number of items Ashlee sold, we cannot get a unique solution, however, we know b must be a whole number, so we then conclude that the only possible solutions are:

$$(a,b)=(0,14),\,(2,13),\,(4,12),\,(6,11),\,(8,10),\,(10,9),\,(12,8),\,(14,7),\,(16,6),\,(18,5),\,(20,4),\,(22,3),\,(24,2),\,(26,1),\,(28,0)$$

But, I suspect they are not asking for the possible solutions, just for $b$ in terms of $a$, which you correctly found.
 
mark. thank you for your stab at this. glad to hear that I'm not the only one coming to that conclusion! much appreciated.
MarkFL said:
Your work is correct...I get:

$$b=\frac{28-a}{2}$$

which is equivalent to your solution.

Now, since we are not given another equation, such as the total number of items Ashlee sold, we cannot get a unique solution, however, we know b must be a whole number, so we then conclude that the only possible solutions are:

$$(a,b)=(0,14),\,(2,13),\,(4,12),\,(6,11),\,(8,10),\,(10,9),\,(12,8),\,(14,7),\,(16,6),\,(18,5),\,(20,4),\,(22,3),\,(24,2),\,(26,1),\,(28,0)$$

But, I suspect they are not asking for the possible solutions, just for $b$ in terms of $a$, which you correctly found.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top