Solving Equivalent Circuit for Thevenin Resistance & Current

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dieinhell100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Equivalent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the Thevenin equivalent circuit related to an inductor in a circuit with a voltage source and resistors. The user successfully calculated the equivalent resistances, Req at 8.89 Ω and Rt at 7.82 Ω, but struggled to determine the short circuit current, Isc. Clarifications were provided regarding the impact of replacing the inductor with a short circuit, confirming that this effectively removes the 65 Ω resistor from the circuit. The user ultimately applied Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to find Isc, concluding with a value of 10.237 A, and acknowledged the complexity introduced by the 65 Ω resistor. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding circuit configurations and the application of KCL in solving for unknown currents.
Dieinhell100
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For t<0, the circuit shown below with the voltage source at 11 volts and three resistors combined into an equivalent, Req. We need to find the Thevenin equivalent circuit for the part of the circuit connected to the inductor.

First find Req, by combining series and parallel resistors.

Req = ? Ω. (I already solved it)

Find the Thevenin resistance across the inductor and the short circuit current.

Rt = ? Ω. (I already solved for it)

Isc = ? A. (This is what I don't have)

Homework Equations



Isc = Voc / Rt (Thevenin/Norton Theorem)

The Attempt at a Solution


The solved values I got (which are correct) for the resistances are:
Req= 8.89 Ω
Rt= 7.82 Ω
I got Rt from 1/Rt= (1/Req) + (1/65)

I've tried multiple times to solve for Isc. I think I mainly have a problem getting Voc or just combining voltage and current sources. I am attaching a picture of the circuit.

How do I get Isc?
 

Attachments

  • HW.png
    HW.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 387
Physics news on Phys.org
When the inductor is replaced by a short circuit, what effectively happens to the 65 Ω resistor? What's the potential across Req?
 
gneill said:
When the inductor is replaced by a short circuit, what effectively happens to the 65 Ω resistor? What's the potential across Req?

Does it short out the 65 Ω resistor? If it does, I had no idea, because I thought for it to short out a parallel resistor, the short circuit has to be parallel ONLY to that resistor.

As for the potential across Req.. I guess I can use voltage division?

Veq= [8.889Ω/(8.889Ω+65Ω)]11v, which gives me 1.323 volts.
 
Dieinhell100 said:
Does it short out the 65 Ω resistor? If it does, I had no idea, because I thought for it to short out a parallel resistor, the short circuit has to be parallel ONLY to that resistor.
A short shorts-out anything and everything it parallels. In this case it is definitely in parallel with the 65 Ω resistor. Here's a way to look at it:
attachment.php?attachmentid=57886&stc=1&d=1366036246.gif

As for the potential across Req.. I guess I can use voltage division?
Take a close look at the above diagram. What potential is the blue node at (with respect to the bottom node)?
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2 KB · Views: 562
gneill said:
A short shorts-out anything and everything it parallels. In this case it is definitely in parallel with the 65 Ω resistor. Here's a way to look at it:
attachment.php?attachmentid=57886&stc=1&d=1366036246.gif


Take a close look at the above diagram. What potential is the blue node at (with respect to the bottom node)?

Ahh. Thank you for taking the time to draw that out.

Sorry, I'm getting a little confused from the different terminology. It sounds like you're asking what the voltage across the short circuit is. I'm not sure I know how to answer that. I'll take guesses though.

I'm supposing that the short circuit practically removes the 65Ω resistor. Is this correct?

My guess is doing Ohm's law on Req with the 65 Ω resistor removed. 11v/8.889Ω = current across I (1.237A), but I'm not sure that helps.

I'm not sure I can apply a KCL at the bottom or top node because of the voltage source. Or am
I supposed to do a source transformation?
 
Dieinhell100 said:
Ahh. Thank you for taking the time to draw that out.

Sorry, I'm getting a little confused from the different terminology. It sounds like you're asking what the voltage across the short circuit is. I'm not sure I know how to answer that. I'll take guesses though.

I'm supposing that the short circuit practically removes the 65Ω resistor. Is this correct?
Correct.
My guess is doing Ohm's law on Req with the 65 Ω resistor removed. 11v/8.889Ω = current across I (1.237A), but I'm not sure that helps.
It does!
I'm not sure I can apply a KCL at the bottom or top node because of the voltage source. Or am
I supposed to do a source transformation?

You can do KCL on the top (blue) node. The current you want is the current through the short (same as the current from the voltage source). You now know the other currents leaving the node...
 
gneill said:
You can do KCL on the top (blue) node. The current you want is the current through the short (same as the current from the voltage source). You now know the other currents leaving the node...

KCL on the top node:

0 = (Leaving currents) - (Entering Currents)
0 = (Current across Req) + (Current Source) - (Current through voltage source)

Current through voltage source = Isc

0= 1.237A + 9A - Isc

Isc = 10.237 A

The website won't tell me if this is correct (I used all my attempts), but I'll assume it is. I just wanted to know where I was going wrong. I guess my pains were mainly coming from that 65Ω resistor.

Thank you very much, gneill.
 
Dieinhell100 said:
KCL on the top node:

0 = (Leaving currents) - (Entering Currents)
0 = (Current across Req) + (Current Source) - (Current through voltage source)

Current through voltage source = Isc

0= 1.237A + 9A - Isc

Isc = 10.237 A

The website won't tell me if this is correct (I used all my attempts), but I'll assume it is. I just wanted to know where I was going wrong. I guess my pains were mainly coming from that 65Ω resistor.

Thank you very much, gneill.

Your result looks good!

Yes, the circuit was made a bit tricky with the 65Ω resistor. But you got there in the end!
 
Back
Top