Solving Exchange of Momentum by Conserving Energy & Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block of wood shot upwards from two different points. It explores how the center of mass (COM) of the block rises in two scenarios: when the bullet is fired at the center versus near the support end. The key point is that while both scenarios result in the same height for the COM, the second case involves rotation, affecting energy distribution. The conservation of momentum ensures that the heights remain equal, despite the energy being partially converted to rotational kinetic energy. Ultimately, the analysis concludes that the height achieved by the COM is the same in both cases, highlighting the complexities of energy conservation in rotational dynamics.
pukb
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
Imagine a block of wood resting on two supports at each end. You point a gun upward under the block and shoot the block upwards.

One scenario is you shoot the block upwards in the exact center. Another scenario is you shoot upwards near one of the support ends. The block is thick enough that in both cases the bullet comes to rest inside the block.

Question: in which case does the centre of mass of the block rise the highest?

I could quantify the first case (both for velocity and distance rise of cog) using conservation of momentum and conservation of energy as follows:
mu = (m+M)V
1/2(mu^2) = (m+M)gh

Can somebody help me in the second case?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi pukb! :smile:

hint: in the second case, why does 1/2 mu2 = (m+M)gh not work? :wink:
 
yes, it does apply - what i meant was the heights to which cog is lifted are not same when force is applied at center and at corner because the latter case will cause some rotation as well. The problem is to quantify that
 
hi pukb! :smile:

(btw, it's better to say centre of mass, com, than centre of gravity, cog :wink:)
pukb said:
…the latter case will cause some rotation as well.

yes! … so the kinetic energy will be the "translational" kinetic energy 1/2 mv2 plus the rotational kinetic energy 1/2 Iω2 :wink:
 
There's a video of this very problem on YouTube. The results are not exactly what you'd expect. The video does compare two wooden blocks, one shot thru the CG and the other shot off-center. Both went the same height into the air. Of course, this raises the question of what happened to the conservation of energy. The block that's spinning should not go as high into the air due to energy being transferred as angular momentum. But it does. What gives?

The video proposed an answer that both blocks must go the same height in order to conserve linear momentum. The difference in energy is due to the bullet not traveling as far into the wood (doing work in the process) and that difference in work is getting translated into angular energy.

Yes, it's not a comforting explanation. But it does seem to be correct.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi Ryoko! :smile:

Yes, I didn't think this through fully :redface:: the energy equation which I said didn't work …
tiny-tim said:
hint: in the second case, why does 1/2 mu2 = (m+M)gh not work? :wink:

should be 1/2 mu2 + 1/2 Iω2 = (m+M)gh + 1/2 Iω2,

which of course is the same equation, with the same u (since u is fixed by conservation of momentum, irrespective of ω and of the slight difference in I).

So h (the height) will be the same in both cases.

Thanks, Ryoko. :smile:
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top