Solving for C1 and C2: A Wave Function Boundary Condition

zhillyz
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A one-dimensional wave function associated with a localized particle can be written as

\varphi (x) = \begin{cases}<br /> 1- \frac{x^2}{8}, &amp; \text{if } 0&lt;x&lt;4, \\<br /> C_1 - \frac{C_2}{x^2}, &amp; \text{if} \,x \geq 4.<br /> \end{cases}

Determine C_1 and C_2 for which this wave function will obey the boundary condition of continuity at x = 4.

Homework Equations



N\A

The Attempt at a Solution



So I am thinking the boundary condition is to make sure both equations hold at x = 4, and fed into the first equation it equals -1 so equate the second to -1 also and find values for C_1 \text{and} C_2 which would be 1 and 32 respectively? Is this correct because the question is worth 6marks which seems like a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Is C_1=1 and C_2=32 the only solution to -1=C_1-\frac{C_2}{16}?

You have two unknowns and one equation, so if you want a unique solution you will need one more independent equation for C_1 and C_2. What can you say about \varphi&#039;(x)?
 


16C_1+16 = C_2 So for values of C_1 = 1,2,3,4 C_2 will = 32,48,64,80 respectively.

or

C_2(n) = C_2(n-1) +16

The first order differential of \varphi? Em that it would be part of the shrodinger equation?
 


zhillyz said:
16C_1+16 = C_2 So for values of C_1 = 1,2,3,4 C_2 will = 32,48,64,80 respectively.

or

C_2(n) = C_2(n-1) +16

Who says that the constants have to be integers? There are an infinite number of solutions.

The first order differential of \varphi? Em that it would be part of the shrodinger equation?

You need to review your notes/textbook on the boundary conditions of the wavefunction. For a finite potential/barrier, the first derivative of the wavefunction must be continuous.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top