Solving for Eigenvalues in a Finite Square Well with Both Walls Finite

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the eigenvalue solutions for a one-dimensional finite square well with both walls finite. The established equation for a single finite wall, k cot(kl) = -α, is used as a foundation. The user attempts to find the solution using boundary conditions and the time-independent Schrödinger equation, ultimately leading to the equation tan(kl) = 2αk / (k^2 - α^2). They explore changing the coordinate system to simplify the problem but find that it leads to different equations. The user expresses frustration at not reaching the desired solution, indicating a need for further assistance.
chris_avfc
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Already defined that for a 1D well with one finite wall the eigenvalue solutions are given by
k cot(kl) = -α

Show the eigenvalue solutions to well with both walls finite is given by

tan(kl) = 2αk / (k^2 - α^2)

Well is width L (goes from 0 to L) with height V_0

Homework Equations



k cot(kl) = -α

tan(kl) = 2αk / (k^2 - α^2)

Time Independent Schrödinger Equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



I will explain briefly as there is a lot of equations and it will look a mess, I can always upload a picture of my work if needs be.

General Solution:
u(x) = Ce^-αx + De^αx

For x < 0
C = 0, so exponential doesn't go to ∞.
For x > L
D = 0 so exponential doesn't go to ∞.

Using boundary conditions where the function and it's derivative must be continuous
With the solution between 0 and L being

u(x) = A sin(kx)

Substituting in L for x

A sin(kL) = Ce^-αL
Ak cos(kL) = -αCe^-αL

Dividing the second by the first

k cot(kL) = -α (As given in question)

This breaks down when substituting in 0 for x.

A sin(k0) = De^α0
Ak cos(k0) = αDe^α0
0 = αD

I thought about changing the coordinates so the well runs from -L/2 to L/2, but that just appears to give

k cot(kL/2) = -α

And

k cot(kl/2) = α

I was/am looking in one textbook, and that manages to get it down to

k tan (kL/2)= α
k cot (kL/2)= -α

Still not what I need, but might be closer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guess nobody can help then. :(
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top