Solving for Electron Acceleration and Time in a Television Tube - Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter elimenohpee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
In a television tube, electrons accelerate from rest to a speed of 2 x 10^8 m/s over a distance of 1.50 cm. The calculated acceleration is approximately 1.3 x 10^18 m/s², which raises concerns about exceeding the speed of light according to relativity. The time taken for this acceleration is estimated at 1.5 x 10^-10 seconds. While the calculations align with Newtonian physics, the high speed suggests that relativistic effects should be considered. However, since this is an introductory course, the focus remains on Newtonian principles, and the calculations are deemed reasonable within that context.
elimenohpee
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a television tube, electrons travel down the tube and strike the fluorescent material at
the end of the tube. Their impact with this material causes light to be emitted, thereby producing
the picture we see. The electrons are accelerated from rest to a speed of 2 x 108 ms-1 in a distance
of 1.50 cm.
(i) What is the acceleration of an electron during this process? (10 marks)
(ii) How long does the acceleration take?


Homework Equations


(i) the acceleration I calculated seems WAY too large. I know the acceleration will be big, but I didn't think it could exceed the speed of light due to the theory of relativity.

(ii) the time to accelerate makes sense, but I think its wrong because I calculated the acceleration wrong.

The Attempt at a Solution



(i) I used the equation that doesn't involve time, only velocity, initial velocity, position and time:
v^2 = v^2(0) + 2a (x - x0)
(2*10^8)^2 = 0 + 2a (0.015m - 0)
a = 1.3 * 10^18 ?

(ii) with a = 1.3 * 10^18, I just plugged it into x = 0.5a(t^2), solved for t and got t = 1.5 * 10^-10 s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Extremely large accelerations do happen in these tubes.
But the speed given in the question - more than half the speed of light - indicates you should be using relativity formulas instead of Newtonian ones.

Can you teach me how to do this?
If you aren't in a relativity class, maybe you aren't supposed to worry about relativity.
 
Its not in a relativity class, its just an introductory course to Newtonian physics. I know we aren't supposed to know about relativity at this point, but that acceleration just didn't make sense to me. Can anyone verify if this is right?
 
I haven't gone through all the calculator work, but it certainly appears to be correct and the acceleration is reasonable. In a non-relativity course, you have it done correctly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top