Chemistry Solving for electron activity given pH and ratio of redox elements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a half-reaction involving electron transfer, specifically 8e- + 9H+ + SO42- = HS- + 4H2O, with a logK value of 4.25. The equilibrium expression derived from this reaction introduces two unknowns: x and e-. The participant expresses confusion about solving for these variables, seeking guidance on applicable formulas. Clarification is provided regarding the interpretation of 'x' in the equilibrium statement. The conversation highlights the challenges of balancing redox reactions and the need for precise definitions in chemical equations.
peeballs
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
What is the apparent pO2 (atm) in equilibrium with a pE governed by the sulfate/sulfide redox buffer when
(SO4
2-) = 10x (HS-) at paH 8.2? Use constants from Table 8.6a, pg. 465, assume I=0.
Relevant Equations
K = Products/Reactants
I've written out the half reaction

8e- + 9H+ + SO42- = HS- + 4H2O

and I know the logK = 4.25 (that's the constant mentioned in the prompt)

I've written out the equilibrium statement of 10^4.25 = ([x^1/8]*[H2O^1/2])/([10x^1/8]*[e-]*[(10^-8.2)^9/8]

However, from there, it seems like I have two unknowns - the X, and the e-, which I'm solving for. I don't know of any formulas that would be useful here and I was specifically told to use this expression to solve it.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You sure x is an unknown, and not a multiplication sign?
 
Borek said:
You sure x is an unknown, and not a multiplication sign?
Yes, but you managed to find me on a different forum and explain why I was having a brainfart so it all works out.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top