Solving for Impact Velocity: A Bullet of Ice at 0°C

AI Thread Summary
To determine the impact velocity needed to melt 68% of a bullet of ice at 0°C, the kinetic energy equation (1/2mv^2) must be equated to the energy required to melt the specific mass of ice (Q = ml). The correct approach involves recognizing that only 68% of the mass is melted, so the equation should reflect this by using 0.68m in the energy calculation. The resulting equation leads to the conclusion that the impact velocity is approximately 674 m/sec. Clarification on using the correct mass percentage is essential for accurate calculations.
noobatphysics
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Bullet of ice at a temperature of 0 degrees celieus is fired into a target
Assuming that all the impact energy is retained by the ice
what impact velocity is needed to melt 68% of the ice

Homework Equations



1/2mv^2
Q = ml

The Attempt at a Solution


i got..
v^2 = 668000
i doubt that is the correct answer
can some show me the steps to work this out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why didn't you use the 68%? The kinetic energy turns into the energy needed to melt 0.68m, not m.
 
um I am still puzzled
LOL
can u show me the steps?
 
I thought you used:

1/2mv^2
Q = ml

and equated them to get:

1/2mv^2=ml
v^2=2l

The statement 1/2mv^2=ml means "all the kinetic energy turns into the energy needed to melt the mass". However, only 68% of the mass melts, so the kinetic energy has to equal 0.68ml.
 
oh i see...

i got... 674 m/sec

doesn't seem right

Ek = 334800 x .68?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top