Solving for \lim_{n\to\infty} (-1)^nsin(1/n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter zacharyh
  • Start date Start date
zacharyh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Asked to compute:

<br /> \lim_{n\to\infty} (-1)^nsin(1/n)<br />

I've broken this limit down into:

<br /> \lim_{n\to\infty} (-1)^n * \lim_{n\to\infty}sin(1/n)<br />

I've determined \lim_{n\to\infty}sin(1/n) = 0

Now I have \lim_{n\to\infty} (-1)^n * 0

This is where I run into trouble...

Attempting to solve for \lim_{n\to\infty} (-1)^n:

-I've tried plugging in integers and rational numbers for n. It jumps to -1 and 1 with integers, and spits out complex numbers when I plug in rational numbers.
-I've also tried graphing this function on a calculator to no avail.
-I've also plugged it into maple and it spits out: (-1..1).

Is it safe to say \lim_{n\to\infty} (-1)^n does not exist?

In which case, I have something that does not exist multiplied by 0, and anything multiplied by 0 equals 0... but I have "nothing" not "anything" ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} (-1)^n does not exist. However,
- sin(1/n)\le (-1)^nsin(1/n)\le sin(1/n)[/itex]<br /> and sin(1/n) goes to 0 as n goes to infinity. What does that tell you?
 
Oh I see...sammich' theorem!
How do you produce that inequality?
I'm not sure how to work with sin(1/x)... can it be related to sin(x) somehow?
 
zacharyh said:
Oh I see...sammich' theorem!
How do you produce that inequality?
I'm not sure how to work with sin(1/x)... can it be related to sin(x) somehow?

For h(x) \leq f(x) \leq g(x)

where \lim_{n\to\infty} h(x) = L,\lim_{n\to\infty} g(x)=L

then

\lim_{n\to\infty} f(x)=L

Look at HallofIvy's hint. What is L?
 
Yes I'm aware that the limit is sandwiched between two 0s and is therefore 0. I guess what I am asking for is a proof of the inequality. How did you decide to pick sin(1/n)? How do I know that it is between those functions?
 
What? Your question was about (-1)n sin(1/n). n is either even or odd. (-1)n is either 1 or -1. I "picked" sin(1/n) because that was the function multiplied by (-1)n.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top