Solving for Parallel Tangent Lines: A Confusing Example

AI Thread Summary
To find the point on the curve y = 1 + 2e^x - 3x where the tangent line is parallel to the line 3x - y = 5, the slope of the line is determined to be 3. The derivative of the curve is calculated as y' = 2e^x - 3. Setting this equal to the slope of the line gives the equation 2e^x - 3 = 3, leading to x = ln(3). The corresponding point on the curve is confirmed to be (ln(3), 7 - 3ln(3)). Graphical representation is suggested for better understanding.
zenity
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm kinda stuck on this question... my text gives me a simple example, but it's far from enlightening. Just wondered if I could get some help!

"At what point on the curve y = 1 + 2e^x - 3x is the tangent line parallel to the line 3x -y =5?"

Would I just need to simply compare the slopes?

I found the derivative of the curve: y'= 2e^x - 3

So I suppose you just set 2e^x = 3... then you get x = ln(3)/2 ?

Thanks~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
parallel means same slope, so u found \frac{dy}{dx} = 2e^x - 3
y=-5+3x, \frac{dy}{dx} = 3
3 = 2e^x - 3
3 = e^x
ln(3) = x
 
Oh, so I had to compute the derivatives for both slopes, then compare them? Interesting... thanks! I have to digest this info now.
 
zenity said:
I'm kinda stuck on this question... my text gives me a simple example, but it's far from enlightening. Just wondered if I could get some help!

"At what point on the curve y = 1 + 2e^x - 3x is the tangent line parallel to the line 3x -y =5?"

Would I just need to simply compare the slopes?

I found the derivative of the curve: y'= 2e^x - 3

So I suppose you just set 2e^x = 3... then you get x = ln(3)/2 ?
-------> Should be -----> 2e^x - 3 = 3 -----------> x = ln(3)
Thanks~
zenity --

Your original approach was CORRECT. You just made the careless error shown above. Method is to determine slope of the line (compute dy/dx of the line OR determine by inspection (like you did) from the line's {y = mx + b} equation that the slope is "3") and then to equate this value to the curve's tangent slope (found by differentiating the curve's equation like you did).

~~
 
so the point would be... ( ln(3), 7-3ln(3) ) ?

I'm just a bit confused graphically.
 
Last edited:
zenity said:
so the point would be... ( ln(3), 7-3ln(3) ) ? <----- CORRECT

I'm just a bit confused graphically.
Your answer is CORRECT. If helpful, sketch the graph to better understand the math. (Or use a graphing calculator.)


~~
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top