Solving for t->0+: L'Hospital's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnhuntsman
  • Start date Start date
johnhuntsman
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
lim__[[t^3 ln(t)] / 3] + (t^3)/9
t->0+

^ in case that's difficult to read here's this.

Now what I don't understand is how this comes out to be 0. I would think that ln(t) as t approaches 0 would be -∞ (since ln(t) keeps getting bigger and bigger in the - direction as t approaches o). You would multiply that by 0 (since t^3 as t approaches 0 gets closer and closer to 0). 0 * -∞ should be indeterminate. 0 * -∞ over 3 (i.e., the term: [t^3 ln(t)] / 3]) should also be indeterminate. I understand how (t^3)/9 is 0. Is this problem meant to be solved with L'Hospital's Rule?

P.S. I've used L'Hospital's rule on it already and it does come out to zero. I just want to check with the people here to see if that is whatI'm supposed to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnhuntsman said:
lim__[[t^3 ln(t)] / 3] + (t^3)/9
t->0+

^ in case that's difficult to read here's this.

Now what I don't understand is how this comes out to be 0. I would think that ln(t) as t approaches 0 would be -∞ (since ln(t) keeps getting bigger and bigger in the - direction as t approaches o). You would multiply that by 0 (since t^3 as t approaches 0 gets closer and closer to 0). 0 * -∞ should be indeterminate. 0 * -∞ over 3 (i.e., the term: [t^3 ln(t)] / 3]) should also be indeterminate. I understand how (t^3)/9 is 0. Is this problem meant to be solved with L'Hospital's Rule?

P.S. I've used L'Hospital's rule on it already and it does come out to zero. I just want to check with the people here to see if that is whatI'm supposed to do.

Yes, Hospital's rule is appropriate for this question. Something else you could've done was use the squeeze theorem.
 
Alright thanks. I appreciate it.
 
johnhuntsman said:
lim__[[t^3 ln(t)] / 3] + (t^3)/9
t->0+

^ in case that's difficult to read here's this.

Now what I don't understand is how this comes out to be 0. I would think that ln(t) as t approaches 0 would be -∞ (since ln(t) keeps getting bigger and bigger in the - direction as t approaches o). You would multiply that by 0 (since t^3 as t approaches 0 gets closer and closer to 0). 0 * -∞ should be indeterminate. 0 * -∞ over 3 (i.e., the term: [t^3 ln(t)] / 3]) should also be indeterminate. I understand how (t^3)/9 is 0. Is this problem meant to be solved with L'Hospital's Rule?

P.S. I've used L'Hospital's rule on it already and it does come out to zero. I just want to check with the people here to see if that is whatI'm supposed to do.

For any fixed power p > 0 we have
\lim_{x \rightarrow 0+} x^p \ln(x) = 0, so things like
x^{1/10} \ln(x), \; \sqrt{x} \ln(x),\; x \ln(x), \ldots
all → 0 as x → 0+. It might help to write
x^p \ln(x) = \ln \left(x^{x^p}\right) \text{ for } x > 0.

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top