Solving for t in a Trig Sin Function

Sparky_
Messages
227
Reaction score
5
Greetings,

I've solved (almost) a problem - with the answer involving sin().

My first solution involves values for which sin() is equal to 0.5 - i.e.30 degrees or 0.5235.

The internal of the sin function is sin(10t -0.927)
t = 0.1451

To complete this solution I need to show the other solutions for this - that is the other values of t for which sin (10t - 0.927) = 0.5.

I thought it would be every pi/2 but I see that does not work.

It's obvious less than pi and greater than pi/2 - meaning the simple sin wave starts at 0 goes through 0.5 crests at 1 at pi/2 and goes back through 0.5 (at what value?) and to 0 at pi.

Thanks so much
-Sparky_
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sin(pi/6)=sin(5pi/6)=.5

The general form is sinx=sin(pi-x).

I can't figure out the rest of your post.
 
I was solving sin(10t-0.927) = 0.5
t = 0.1451

but it will actually be t = 0.1451 + (something periodic)

how do I find the something periodic? - meaning t = 0.1451 =n*pi/2 or some such?
 
Suppose you set 10t-0.927 equal to a new variable y. Then you would have sin(y) = 0.5, and

y=\frac{\pi}{6} + 2n\pi \text{ or }y=\frac{5\pi}{6} + 2n\pi

because sine has a period of 2\pi, and \sin a = \sin(\pi - a). Replace y with 10t-0.927 in both of those cases and solve for t.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top