Solving for Theta: Help With a Ballistics Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter VantagePoint72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ballistics Theta
VantagePoint72
Messages
820
Reaction score
34
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to solve for theta in a derivitive of a ballistics equation and I'm afraid I'm stuck. My trigonometry is a little rusty, can someone help me out? I have:

cos(theta)*sin(theta)=gd/2v^2

With the information I'm given I can solve the the right side of the equation ending up with:

cos(theta)*sin(theta)=some number

How do I get theta by knowing what cos(theta)*sin(theta) equals?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cos(t)sin(t) = 2sin(t)cos(t)/2 = sin(2t)/2. Now you can use arcsine...
 
Just clarifying what Muzza wrote above...so there's no room for misunderstanding :

cos(t)sin(t) = \frac {2sin(t)cos(t)}{2} = \frac {sin(2t)}{2}.
 
OK, thanks for the help!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top