Solving for Time of Flight of Stunt Vehicle

AI Thread Summary
A stunt vehicle leaves an incline at 35 m/s from a height of 52 meters. The discussion focuses on calculating the time of flight using the equation d = Vit + 1/2at², where the initial velocity component accounts for the additional height gained after leaving the incline. Participants clarify that the equation already incorporates the extra distance traveled due to the initial velocity. The confusion arises from interpreting the total distance in the Y direction, but it is confirmed that the equation correctly reflects the motion. Overall, the forum emphasizes understanding the physics principles behind projectile motion.
Format
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
A stunt vehical leaves and incline with a speed of 35 m/s at a height of 52-m above level ground. Air reistance is negligible.

Find the vehicals time of flight?

Well i found the x and y components of the vehicals velocity. And i know to use d = Vit + 1/2at² giving me:

-52 = 16.4t + 1/2(-9.8)t²

My question is why can you do this? The distance of 52-m only includes the hieght of the cliff, not the height it reaches above the cliff due to leaving it on an incline. Why doesn't that make a difference in the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the answer is that equation already takes into account the "height it reaches above the cliff due to leaving it on an incline." That's what the 16.4t is.

If the height is only 52m, then it would be d=.5at^2
 
The 16.4 is the initial velocity though. Wouldnt the answer to -52 = 16.4t + 1/2t² be the time it takes from ground level to reach a height of 52 meters?

The total distance in the Y direction is more the 52...i don't understand lol
 
-52 = 16.4t + 1/2(-9.8)t²
This is correct!

The total distance is more than 52, yes. That's why the equation is:
d=Vit+.5at^2
Notice the Vi*t, that's that accounts for the extra distance

so really, your distance is d-Vi=.5at^2
-52-16.4t = + 1/2(-9.8)t²

-52-16.4t is the real distance, see now?
 
ah ok i think i got it. Thx :biggrin:
 
yeah, np, that's what this physics fourm is for, and I love it! :-p
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top