Solving for Unstretched Length in Jump Problem: ##l_0 = 97.5m##

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Length
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the unstretched length of a cord for a man jumping off a bridge, given his mass, initial velocity, and the stiffness of the cord. Using conservation of energy, the equation derived is quadratic in terms of the unstretched length, yielding two solutions: one unrealistic at 203m and a second reasonable value of 97.5m. The discussion highlights that the extra root occurs because the potential energy becomes positive when the unstretched length exceeds the fall height. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the physical context of the problem, as incorrect assumptions can lead to misleading results. The analysis concludes that the correct unstretched length for the bungee cord to stop the jumper above the water is approximately 97.5m.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



The ##m = 75kg## man jumps off the bridge with ##v_1 = 1.5 m/s##. Determine the unstretched length ##l_0## of the cord in order that he stops momentarily above the surface of the water. The stiffness is ##k = 80 N/m##.

Picture: http://gyazo.com/80220984e620ed5fc0c58c8207e79ba9

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is one of those problems they don't give the answer for and I'm wondering if this is okay.

I drew my FBD stick figure with the Datum plane located through position A. I then used conservation:

##T_1 + V_1 = T_2 + V_2##

Since I stuck the datum plane at the top where the man is, he currently posses no potential energy at all, only kinetic.

In the final phase, the man has lost all of his kinetic energy and it is now in the form of potential. So we have:

##\frac{1}{2} (75) (1.5)^2 + 0 = 0 - (75)(9.81)(150) + \frac{1}{2} (80) (150 - l_0)^2##

Which is quadratic in ##l_0##. Solving I obtain ##l_{0_1} = 203m##, which makes no physical sense at all since it exceeds the jumping height. ##l_{0_2} = 97.5m##, which seems reasonable.

Does this look okay?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your answers are correct. He falls for ##l_0## meters at which point the rope becomes taut. Over the next ##150 - l_0## meters, two forces act on him, tension and gravity. Each force does work but ##W_{tension} - W_{gravity} = E_k##. This gives a pretty complicated formula that can be solved for ##l_0##. With some computer help I got the same two answers: 202.55m and 97.45m.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The reason you get the extra root, is because (150-l_0)^2 is positive if l0>150, so the potential energy is positive. This is true for a spring with length l0 , but not for a bungee cord which has 0 potential energy if the cord is longer than the height of the fall.

Your computation is rather dangerous, because it will produce the right result if the bungee jumper comes to a stop at the bottom, but if the bungee jumper does not come to a stop, you might still get a result.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top