Solving Force on Block A in Accelerating Masses Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piamedes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating
AI Thread Summary
To determine the force required on block A to prevent block B from falling, the equations of motion for both blocks were analyzed, leading to the expression F_a = (g(m_a + m_b))/μ. The calculations initially yielded 1960 Newtons, but the textbook answer is 172 Newtons, prompting a request for clarification on the solution process. Key variables were defined, including F_a as the applied force, F_f as the frictional force, and F_c as the contact force. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying forces in the Free Body Diagrams to resolve discrepancies in the calculations. Further assistance is sought to reconcile the differences in the calculated and expected results.
Piamedes
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



19: There is a block a, 100kg and block b 10kg on the right towards the top of block a, hanging in mid air. a force is applied to these two blocks on the left, pointing to the right. THe problem is as follows: What force must be exerted on block A in order for block B not to fall? First, draw a Free Body Diagram of each block and one of them together. The coefficient of static friction between blocks A and B is 0.55, and the horizontal surface is frictionless.


Homework Equations



<br /> \sum F = ma<br />

<br /> F_f = \mu F_n<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I started off by finding the applied force in terms of the acceleration of the system in the x direction.

<br /> \sum F_a = m_a a<br />

<br /> m_a a = F_a - F_c<br />

<br /> \sum F_b = m_b a<br />

<br /> m_b a = F_c<br />

Therefore

<br /> F_a = a ( m_a + m_b )<br />

Then I substituted in for acceleration

<br /> a = \frac {F_c}{m_b}<br />

<br /> F_a = \frac {F_c ( m_a + m_b )}{m_b}<br />

After that I moved to the y direction to solve for the contact force

<br /> \sum F_b = 0<br />

<br /> 0 = F_f - m_b g<br />

<br /> m_b g = \mu F_c<br />

<br /> F_c = \frac {m_b g}{\mu}<br />

I then substituted that back into my equation for the x direction

<br /> F_a = \frac {m_b g (m_a + m_b )}{m_b \mu} = \frac {g (m_a +m_b)}{\mu}<br />

Plugging in the given values yields

<br /> F_a = \frac {g (100 kg + 10 kg)}{.55} = 1960 Newtons<br />

However the answer given in the book is 172 Newtons. I went back over my work and tried to get the given answer, but failed. If anyone has any idea on how to get 172 Newtons, I'm more than welcome to them. All help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be a little more clear about the things that you define? For example, you write
\sum F_a = m_a a followed a little later by F_a = a ( m_a + m_b ). What is F_a and what are you summing over? Is there a picture included in the question? Did you try drawing one with all the forces identified?
 
Sorry about the lack of clarity.

\sum F_a = m_a a means the sum of forces on block a

\sum F_b = m_b a means the sum of forces on block b

F_a means the applied force for which you are solving

F_f means the frictional force between the two blocks

F_c means the contact force between the two blocks

Diagram of the question

http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/329/diagramzk1.jpg
http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=78&i=diagramzk1.jpg

Free Body Diagrams

http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/4472/fbdtj6.jpg
http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=357&i=fbdtj6.jpg

I'm pretty sure about all the labeled forces except for the reaction to friction. However I can't see how that would affect the horizontal force and change the necessary applied force since there is no friction between the floor and block A. Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top