Solving Freely Moving Mass Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics homework problem involving a mass with a moment of inertia and an impulse applied at a distance from its center of mass. Participants clarify that to find the angular speed, one must calculate the torque from the impulse and apply the angular version of Newton's second law. The correct relationship established is that the impulse equals the change in momentum, leading to the formula for angular momentum. Ultimately, the angular speed is derived as ω = P·x/I, where P is the impulse, x is the distance from the center of mass, and I is the moment of inertia. This approach effectively combines principles of linear and angular motion to solve the problem.
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Given: mass m, moment of inertia I and a impulse applied at a distance x form the center of mass (c.m.).

Find the angular speed and the speed of the c.m.

post-10274-1215940293.png


Homework Equations



\sum M_O = I \ddot{ \theta}F\Delta t = \sum m_i v_i

The Attempt at a Solution



I can solve for the acceleration but do I have to use a momentum balance to solve for angular speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dirk_mec1 said:
Given: mass m, moment of inertia I and a impulse applied at a distance x from the center of mass (c.m.).

Find the angular speed and the speed of the c.m.

I can solve for the acceleration but do I have to use a momentum balance to solve for angular speed?

Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:

(Do you mean acceleration? It's an impulse … the acceleration is taken to be irrelevant/infinite :confused:)

For the angular speed, find the torque of the impulse, then use the angular version of Newton's second law. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:
Hi tim!

For the angular speed, find the torque of the impulse, then use the angular version of Newton's second law. :smile:
Yes, this solves for the acceleration as shown in angular version of Newton second law:

<br /> \sum M_O = I \ddot{ \theta} <br />

But I presume you mean:

<br /> \sum M_O = I \ddot{ \theta} = I \omega^2 r<br />

right?
 
impulse

Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:
dirk_mec1 said:
But I presume you mean:

\sum M_O = I \ddot{ \theta} = I \omega^2 r

right?

No … wrong formula … that's something like the formula for a continuous centripetal force making the centre of mass move in a large circle.

When the force ends, the circular motion stops!

This is an impulse, an instantaneous force, that makes the body spin on it own axis, with the centre of mass moving in a circle of radius zero.

When the force ends, the circular motion continues! :smile:

Newton's second law for impulses takes the forms:

impulse = momentum after minus momentum before;

torque of impulse = angular momentum after minus angular momentum before. :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:
impulse = momentum after minus momentum before;
So in formula form:

<br /> F \Delta t = \Delta p

torque of impulse = angular momentum after minus angular momentum before. :smile:
\mathbf{L}=\sum_i \mathbf{r}_i\times m_i \mathbf{V}_iSo if I understand you correctly the torque is :

F \Delta t \cdot x

And how do I proceed?
 
Last edited:
I'm Pulse

Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:

(have a delta: ∆)
dirk_mec1 said:
So in formula form:

F \Delta t = \Delta p

Yes and no …

F ∆t is correct, if you're given F (a force) and ∆t (a time interval).

But the question doesn't give you those …

it gives you an impulse …

let's call it P (for "I'm Pulse" :biggrin:) …

Then the formula is P = ∆p. :smile:

And the torque is Pxx
\mathbf{L}=\sum_i \mathbf{r}_i\times m_i \mathbf{V}_i

And how do I proceed?

Well, that formula for angular momentum L is correct in principle (though you could have written it L = ∑ri x pi) …

but again you're not given the individual ri and pi

you're given the moment of inertia, I …

so L = … ? :smile:

and then ∆L = … ? :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:

so L = … ? :smile:
Well there´s another formule here in my book it reads:

\mathbf{L}= I \mathbf{\omega}

and then ∆L = … ? :smile:
Pxx?
 


dirk_mec1 said:
Well there´s another formule here in my book it reads:

\mathbf{L}= I \mathbf{\omega}
and then ∆L = … ? :smile:

Pxx?

Looks good! :smile:
 
So

Px=I \omega \rightarrow \omega = \frac{P \cdot x}{ I}

right, Tim?
 
Back
Top