Solving Frictionless System: Wood Block & Projectile

AI Thread Summary
A wooden block on a frictionless icy plane is struck by a projectile, leading to a discussion on calculating the final velocities of both objects. The conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations are applied, with initial calculations leading to confusion and errors. After revising the approach and substituting variables, the correct quadratic equation is derived, yielding two potential solutions for the final velocities. The second solution, which maintains conservation of momentum, is selected as the valid outcome. The final velocities are determined to be approximately 199.95 m/s for the projectile and 0.2001 m/s for the wooden block, confirming the calculations.
mmoadi
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wooden block with a length of 10 cm and a mass of 1 kg lies on an icy plane. A projectile with mass of 2 g hits the wooden block with velocity of 300 m/s and breaks through its center of gravity. How much are the final velocities of the wooden block and the projectile? While moving through the wooden block, the projectile worked on it with a force of 500 N. This is a frictionless system.

Homework Equations



KE= ½ mv²
p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution

½ m(1)v(1-initial)²= ½ m(1)v(1-final)² + ½m(2)v(2-final)²+F*d

And

m(1)v(1-initial)= m(1)v(1-final) + m(2)v(2-final)

Correct formula thanks to help from "kuruman"- PF Contributor and Homework Helper Homework Helper:smile: Thank you again!

Then I tried to express v(2-final) with the components of the second formula (conservation of the momentum) and insert it into the first formula (KE) but it just got very complicated and weird.

Then I did some more research and find an easier approach of solving my weirdness:

First, I applied:
x= v(1-final)/ / v(1-initial)
y= v(2-final) / v(1-initial)
and
m(2)/m(1)= 1kg/ 0.002kg= 500
F*d= 50J

After I plugged in the above, I obtained:
1. For the conservation of the moment: 1= x + 500y → x= 1- 500y
2. For the KE: 1= x² + 500y² + 50

Now, I plugged x value from the first equation into the second equation and after arranging I got:
0= 20y (250.5y – 1)

We now that velocity cannot be 0, so the correct solution is y= 1/ 250.5

Last step:

y= v(2-final) / v(1-initial) → v(2-final)= y* v(1-initial)= 1.19 m/s

v(2-final)= 1.19 m/s → velocity of the wooden block after the bullet passes through

x= 1- 500y= -0.996
x= v(1-final) / v(1-initial) → v(1-final)= x* v(1-initial)= -298.8 m/s

v(1-final)= 298.8 m/s → velocity of the bullet after it passes through the block

Please tell me that this is correct?!
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try putting your final values of 1.19 and 298.8 back into the original equation for momentum:
m(1)v(1-initial)= m(1)v(1-final) + m(2)v(2-final)
.002*300 = .002*298.8 + 1*1.19
0.6 = 1.7876
According to that, your solution does not conserve momentum!
Better check my work - I often make calculating mistakes.

It seems to me the x and y substitution just adds complexity. Could you show us what you got when you solved the momentum equation and substituted into the energy equation? It should be just a quadratic equation which can easily be solved on a calculator or spreadsheet.
 


So my steps were correct?


Delphi51 said:
It seems to me the x and y substitution just adds complexity. Could you show us what you got when you solved the momentum equation and substituted into the energy equation? It should be just a quadratic equation which can easily be solved on a calculator or spreadsheet.

:redface: Ooops! I exactly know where I went wrong- 50/50 is not 0 but 1. So what i should have gotten is:

0= 5010y² + 20y + 1

I think I got it right this time:smile:

And now it's just a quadratic equation which is a little complicate to solve, so back to work!
 


Not only patience but also persistence is a virtue. In the end it all pays off:biggrin:

Delphi51 said:
It seems to me the x and y substitution just adds complexity.

I took your advice and plugged the numbers into the equations and here is the result of my hard labor:wink::

Conservation of the moment:
m(1)v(1-initial)= m(1)v(1-final) + m(2)v(2-final)
(0.002)(300)= (0.002)v(1-final) + (1)v(2-final)
0.6= 0.002v(1-final) + v(2-final) → v(2-final)= 0.6 - 0.002v(1-final)

Energy:
½ m(1)v(1-initial)²= ½ m(1)v(1-final)² + ½m(2)v(2-final)²+F*d
½ (0.002)(300)²= ½ (0.002) v(1-final)² + ½ (1) v(2-final)² + 50
90= 0.001 v(1-final)² + 0.5 v(2-final)² + 50
0= 0.001 v(1-final)² + 0.5 (0.6 - 0.002v(1-final))² - 40
0= 0.001002 v(1-final)² - 0.0012v(1-final) – 39.82

v(1-final)= [-(-0.0012) ± sqrt[(0.0012)² - 4(0.001002)(-39.82)]] / 2(0.001002)
v(1-final)= (0.0012 ± 0.3995) / 0.002004

First solution: v(1-final)= -198.75 m/s → v(2-final)= 0.9975 m/s
Second solution: v(1-final)= 199.95 m/s → v(2-final)= 0.2001 m/s

As the bullet continues to fly forward, I chose the second solution to be the solution of the problem.

Quick recheck for the conservation of the moment:
m(1)v(1-initial)= m(1)v(1-final) + m(2)v(2-final)
(0.002)(300)= (0.002)(199.95) + (1)(0.2001)
0.6 = 0.6

Are my calculations correct?
Thank you for helping!:smile:
 


Good work, mmoadi! I had a different answer and your solution showed me where my mistake was. Thank you for showing the work.
 


Thank you for helping and have a spooky Halloween weekend!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top