Solving Gas Law Problems: Partial Pressure & Relative Diffusion Rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Gas law Law
AI Thread Summary
To solve the gas law problem regarding partial pressures, one must convert the weights of carbon dioxide and ammonia into moles, as partial pressures are proportional to their molar fractions. For the second question about relative diffusion rates, Graham's law can be applied, which states that the rate of diffusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of its molecular weight. Given that the relative rate of diffusion is 1.89 and the molecular weight of methane is 16, the molecular weight of the other gas can be calculated using the formula derived from Graham's law. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving gas law problems effectively. Mastery of these principles will enhance comprehension of gas behavior in mixtures.
maximade
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
heres a partial pressure one:
1. A mixture of gases containing equal weights of carbon dioxide, CO, and ammonia exerts an overall pressure of 450 torr. What pressure is exerted by each gas individually?

my last question is:
2. The relative rate of diffusion between two gases is 1.89. If the lighter gas is methane (mw=16), what is the molecular weight of the other gases?

for the first one, I could probably guess and check to get my answer, but i wouldn't understand it overall. For the second one, my teacher didn't even go over rates and that stuff. Mind explaining to me how to get the answer? thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Convert weights to moles. Partiall pressures are proportional to molar fractions.

2. Graham's law

Please note, that you should use homework template, when asking homework questions.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top