Solving Graphs of All Nature | Velocity, Accerleration & Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Nature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting graphs related to motion, specifically velocity, acceleration, and force. It clarifies that if velocity is constant, there is no net force acting on the object, contrary to the initial confusion about acceleration. The relationship between these graphs is explained through the concepts of slopes and areas under the curve, indicating that force and acceleration graphs are equivalent when mass is constant. The need for calculus knowledge is mentioned to provide more precise assistance. Overall, understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately graphing motion dynamics.
Spectre32
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
Alrighty, I have a problems with trying to convert graphs into.. well other graphs. Right now I'm sort of stuck on Velocity, Accerleration and Force. For instance covering this statement into a Graph. the object moves away from the origin with a constant velocity. Then I got to graph it as the force. Now i have it graphed and i have a straight line in the positive area in the force graph. Something like that is rather easy, but what if the accerleation is changing? I remeber something about if the accerleration in constant, that there is no force. Any help would be appericated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"I remeber something about if the accerleration in constant, that there is no force."

No, if the VELOCITY is constant there is no force.

F= ma so, for constant mass, anyway, the graphs of Force and Acceleration are equivalent. Roughly speaking, if you have a velocity graph and want to draw the acceleration graph, you need to look at slopes. If you have acceleration and want to draw velocity or if you have velocity and want to draw displacement, you need to look at area under the curve.

I would need to know what calculus you have to work with to be more precise.
 
And did you actually say "alrighty"? Do people really talk that way?
 
I just started taking calc this year, so my knowledge isn't all that much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top