Solving Gravitation Question: Noam Struggling With Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter noamriemer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
noamriemer
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello! I fail to understand this question... I don't even know how to approach it...

Given: m\frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}} {d\tau^{2}} =e{F^{\mu}_{nu}} \frac{dx^{\nu}} {d\tau}

I have to define u^{\mu}= \frac {dx^{\mu}} {d\tau^2}
and obtain:
u^0= cosh(\frac {eE\tau} {m}) u^0(0)+ sinh(\frac {eE\tau} {m})u^1(0)

u^1= sinh(\frac {eE\tau} {m}) u^0(0)+ cosh(\frac {eE\tau} {m})u^1(0)

I don't understand what I should do. First, what does u(0) mean? u(x=0)? how do I obtain these equations?
What is the relation between x^{\mu} and x^{\nu}?
If I define this four vector, u, and u refers to mu, than what am I to do with the other index, nu?
Thank you! I have been struggling for two days...
Noam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert in GR or tensors, but I can give you some help based on what I do know:

noamriemer said:
Hello! I fail to understand this question... I don't even know how to approach it...

Given: m\frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}} {d\tau^{2}} =e{F^{\mu}_{nu}} \frac{dx^{\nu}} {d\tau}

It looks like there's a slight typo above, and it should be m\frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}} {d\tau^{2}} =e{F^{\mu}_{\nu}} \frac{dx^{\nu}} {d\tau} Now remember that the Einstein summation convention is in effect: whenever you see repeated indices, one on the top and one on the bottom, you sum over them (and so that index disappears). So the expression above really is a shorthand for:m\frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}} {d\tau^{2}} =e\sum_{\nu = 0}^3{F^{\mu}_{\nu}} \frac{dx^{\nu}} {d\tau}
noamriemer said:
I have to define u^{\mu}= \frac {dx^{\mu}} {d\tau^2}
I'm going to assume there was a slight typo here as well, and that the definition should have been u^\mu = \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}. I'm assuming that because it sounds like u^\mu is meant to be a 4-velocity. If so, then the expression above becomes:m\frac{du^{\mu}} {d\tau} =e{F^{\mu}_{\nu}} u^\nu At this point, I would say that in order to solve the problem, you'd have to know what the components of the tensor F_\nu^\mu are.

Since each index can take on any of four different values from 0 to 3, the above equation is really a shorthand for four different equations, one for each component of the "4-acceleration." You get the four equations by considering each possible value for \mu in turn:m\frac{du^0} {d\tau} =e\sum_{\nu=0}^3{F^{0}_{\nu}} u^\num\frac{du^1} {d\tau} =e\sum_{\nu=0}^3{F^{1}_{\nu}} u^\num\frac{du^2} {d\tau} =e\sum_{\nu=0}^3{F^{2}_{\nu}} u^\num\frac{du^3} {d\tau} =e\sum_{\nu=0}^3{F^{3}_{\nu}} u^\nu As you can see, tensor notation is really compact! So, you have some differential equations to solve :wink:

noamriemer said:
and obtain:
u^0= cosh(\frac {eE\tau} {m}) u^0(0)+ sinh(\frac {eE\tau} {m})u^1(0)

u^1= sinh(\frac {eE\tau} {m}) u^0(0)+ cosh(\frac {eE\tau} {m})u^1(0)

I don't understand what I should do. First, what does u(0) mean? u(x=0)? how do I obtain these equations?
Well, the parameter tau is the independent variable that uμ depends on, so uμ(0) = uμ(τ = 0).
noamriemer said:
What is the relation between x^{\mu} and x^{\nu}?
If I define this four vector, u, and u refers to mu, than what am I to do with the other index, nu?
Thank you! I have been struggling for two days...
Noam
They are both the same -- symbols for the position coordinates. Either μ or ν is an index that can range from 0 to 3, so:

xμ = (x0, x1, x2, x3)

and,

xν = (x0, x1, x2, x3)

So the only difference is what symbol you're using for the index. Hopefully the preceding discussion shows why its important to choose different symbols for different indices once you start doing tensor operations.
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much for your reply...
Yap, all the typos you found are typos...

Actually, I did what you wrote (well, most of it) before, and still can't solve...
But you did clear some things for me, and thank you for that...
I know how the F tensor looks like (I just have no idea how to write it in latex- that is why I did not add this information... but ill try:)

F= 0 E 0 0
E 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Meaning (if I understood right) that I have:
m \frac {du^{0}} {d\tau} = eE \frac {dx^{1}} {d\tau}
m \frac {du^{1}} {d\tau} = eE \frac {dx^{0}} {d\tau}

And how do I connect that to what I need? Have you got any clue for me?
Thank you for your help!
Noam
 
noamriemer said:
Thank you so much for your reply...
Yap, all the typos you found are typos...

Actually, I did what you wrote (well, most of it) before, and still can't solve...
But you did clear some things for me, and thank you for that...
I know how the F tensor looks like (I just have no idea how to write it in latex- that is why I did not add this information... but ill try:)

F= 0 E 0 0
E 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

You can use code tags to preserve whitespace:

Code:
0  E  0  0
E  0  0  0
0  0  0  0
0  0  0  0

If this is the matrix you meant, then you can write in in LaTeX as follows:

Code:
[tex]
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & E & 0 & 0\\
E & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}
[/tex]

which produces <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; E &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> E &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

noamriemer said:
Meaning (if I understood right) that I have:
m \frac {du^{0}} {d\tau} = eE \frac {dx^{1}} {d\tau}
m \frac {du^{1}} {d\tau} = eE \frac {dx^{0}} {d\tau}

And how do I connect that to what I need? Have you got any clue for me?
Thank you for your help!
Noam

Yeah, that's right, but I would keep everything in terms of u0 and u1, since what you really have is a coupled set of first-order ODEs for these two variables:\frac{du^0}{d\tau} = \frac{eE}{m} u^1\frac{du^1}{d\tau} = \frac{eE}{m} u^0One step that might help would be to decouple them. For instance, if you solve for u1 using the first equation, and substitute the result into the second equation, you'll end up with a second-order ODE for u0 only. It should be one that you can solve as well. Here are two things that might help: remember that if you have two functions that are solutions to an ODE, then any linear combination of those functions will also be a solution to that ODE. Remember also to apply the initial conditions (at tau = 0). To get a unique solution for a second-order ODE, you need two initial conditions: the initial value of the function, and the initial value of its first derivative.
 
Got it- Thanks to you!

Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top